Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
Answers without the blur. Sign up and see all textbooks for free! Illustration

Q. 2.19

Expert-verified
An Introduction to Thermal Physics
Found in: Page 64
An Introduction to Thermal Physics

An Introduction to Thermal Physics

Book edition 1st
Author(s) Daniel V. Schroeder
Pages 356 pages
ISBN 9780201380279

Answers without the blur.

Just sign up for free and you're in.

Illustration

Short Answer

Use Stirling's approximation to find an approximate formula for the multiplicity of a two-state paramagnet. Simplify this formula in the limit NNto obtain ΩNe/NN. This result should look very similar to your answer to Problem 2.17; explain why these two systems, in the limits considered, are essentially the same.

The two state of paramagnet and the system is formaly equivalent to an Einstein solid

ΩNeNN

See the step by step solution

Step by Step Solution

Step 1 Two state of paramagnet 

Consider two-state paramagnet with N magnetic dipoles and N energy quanta, since the system is formally equivalent to an Einstein solid (we're distributing the energy quanta among dipoles rather than oscillators). The multiplicity of the paramagnet is then:

ΩN',N=N+N-1N

Writing out the binomial coefficient:

ΩN,N=N+N-1N=N+N-1!N!(N-1)!

since N>>N, and they are large numbers, so:

ΩN,N=N+N!N!N!

take the natural logarithms for both sides:

ln(Ω)=lnN+N!N!N!

but, we have these logarithmic relations:

lnab=ln(a)-ln(b) ln(ab)=ln(a)+ln(b)

Step 2 Logarithm

ln(Ω)=lnN+N!N!N!=lnN+N!-ln(N!)-lnN!

use Stirling's approximation for the logarithm of a factorial:

ln(n!)nln(n)-n

so,we get:

ln(Ω)N+NlnN+N-N+N-Nln(N)+N-NlnN+N

ln(Ω)N+NlnN+N-Nln(N)-NlnN

If we now use the assumption that N>>N, we get:

ln(Ω)N+NlnNNN+1-Nln(N)-NlnN

we factored out N from the first logarithm:

ln(Ω)N+Nln(N)+lnNN+1-Nln(N)-NlnN

but, we have the logarithmic relation:

lnab+1ab

for b>>a, so:

Step 3 To neglect second term 

ln(Ω)Nln(N)+NNN+Nln(N)+NNN-Nln(N)-NlnNln(Ω)Nln(N)+N2N+N-NlnN

ln(Ω)N+Nln(N)+NN-Nln(N)-NlnN

ln(Ω)Nln(N)-lnN+N2N+N

but, =ln(Ω)NlnNN+N, so:

ln(Ω)NlnNN+N2N+N

use the assumption thatN>>N, to neglect the second term:

ln(Ω)NlnNN+N

Step 4 Exponentiating both sides 

Exponentiating both sides this equation gives the approximate value for Ω, so:

e(ln(Ω))eNlnNN+NΩelnNNeNΩelnNNNeN\

but,e^{\ln (x)}=x, SO:

ΩNNNeN

ΩNeNN

The corresponding result in N<<N case is:

ΩNeNN

which could have been predicted easily, since NandNappear symmetrically in the following approximation:

ΩN,N=N+N!N!N!

Most popular questions for Physics Textbooks

Icon

Want to see more solutions like these?

Sign up for free to discover our expert answers
Get Started - It’s free

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.

Sign up for free
94% of StudySmarter users get better grades.