Open in App
Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:

Suppose that \(\Delta=\Delta_{f_{1}, \ldots, f_{r}}\) has constant rank \(r\) and is invariant under each of \(X_{1}, \ldots, X_{k} \in \mathrm{V}(\mathcal{O})\). Let \(\mathcal{O}_{k}\) be an open subset of \(\mathcal{O}\) and let $s_{1}, \ldots, s_{k}$ be real numbers with the following property: $$ \left(s_{i}, x\right) \in \mathcal{D}_{X_{i}}, \quad \forall x \in \mathcal{O}_{i}, i=1, \ldots, k, $$ where we define $$ \mathcal{O}_{k-1}:=e^{s_{k} X_{k}} \mathcal{O}_{k}, \ldots, \mathcal{O}_{1}:=e^{s_{2} X_{2}} \mathcal{O}_{2}, \mathcal{O}_{0}:=e^{s_{1} X_{1}} \mathcal{O}_{1} . $$ Assume that \(Y \in \mathbb{V}\left(\mathcal{O}_{0}\right)\) is such that $Y(z) \in \Delta(z)\( for each \)z \in \mathcal{O}_{0}$. Then, $\operatorname{Ad}_{s_{k} X_{k}} \ldots \operatorname{Ad}_{s_{1} X_{1}} Y(x) \in \Delta(x)\( for all \)x \in \mathcal{O}_{k}$.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Given a distribution \(\Delta\) with invariant constant rank \(r\), it is invariant under the action of a given set of vector fields \(X_1,\ldots,X_k \in \mathrm{V}(\mathcal{O})\) on an open set \(\mathcal{O}\subset M\). We are also given a sequence of real numbers \(s_1,\ldots,s_k\) satisfying certain properties, such as \(\left(s_{i}, x\right) \in \mathcal{D}_{X_{i}}\). We need to show that the adjoint action of the product of the exponentials of these vector fields on a vector field \(Y\in\mathbb{V}\left(\mathcal{O}_{0}\right)\), that takes the values in distribution \(\Delta\), will also take the values in distribution \(\Delta\). To prove this, we use the invariance of \(\Delta\) under each \(X_i\) and apply the adjoint action of each \(X_i\) to \(Y\). The overall result \(\operatorname{Ad}_g Y\) will still be in the distribution \(\Delta\). Therefore, we have \(\operatorname{Ad}_g Y(x)\in\Delta(x)\) for all \(x\in\mathcal{O}_k\), which proves our result.
See the step by step solution

Step by step solution

Unlock all solutions

Get unlimited access to millions of textbook solutions with Vaia Premium

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Step 1: Understand the Given Information

We have a distribution \(\Delta=\Delta_{f_{1},\ldots,f_{r}}\) with constant rank \(r\) and invariant under each vector field \(X_i\in\mathrm{V}(\mathcal{O})\), \(i=1,\ldots,k\). Given an open set \(\mathcal{O}_k\subset\mathcal{O}\), and real numbers \(s_1,\ldots,s_k\), we define sequential open sets \(\mathcal{O}_{k-1}, \ldots, \mathcal{O}_0\), based on the given property: \[ \mathcal{O}_{k-1}:=e^{s_{k} X_{k}} \mathcal{O}_{k}, \ldots, \mathcal{O}_{1}:=e^{s_{2} X_{2}} \mathcal{O}_{2}, \mathcal{O}_{0}:=e^{s_{1} X_{1}} \mathcal{O}_{1} . \]

Step 2: Define the Adjoint Action

We define the adjoint action \(\operatorname{Ad}_g\) of an element \(g\in G\) on an element \(Y\in\mathfrak{g}\) as: \[ \operatorname{Ad}_g(Y)=g Y g^{-1}, \] where \(G\) is a Lie Group and \(\mathfrak{g}\) is its corresponding Lie Algebra.

Step 3: Show the Result

We are given that \(Y(z)\in\Delta(z)\), for all \(z\in\mathcal{O}_0\). We have to show: \[ \operatorname{Ad}_{s_{k} X_{k}} \ldots \operatorname{Ad}_{s_{1} X_{1}} Y(x) \in \Delta(x), \; \forall x \in \mathcal{O}_{k}. \] Let \(g=e^{s_k X_k} \ldots e^{s_1 X_1}\). Then the adjoint action of \(g\) can be written as: \[ \operatorname{Ad}_g Y = g Y g^{-1}. \] We have to show that for any point \(x\in\mathcal{O}_k\): \[ \operatorname{Ad}_g Y(x) \in \Delta(x). \]

Step 4: Use Invariance of \(\Delta\) under \(X_i\)

Since \(\Delta\) is invariant under each of the vector fields \(X_i\), applying the adjoint action of each \(X_i\) to \(Y\) will ensure that the result is still in \(\Delta\). The adjoint action of \(g\) is the sequential application of the adjoint actions of each \(X_i\), and since \(\Delta\) is invariant under each action, the overall result \(\operatorname{Ad}_g Y\) will still be in the distribution \(\Delta\). Therefore, we have \(\operatorname{Ad}_g Y(x)\in\Delta(x)\) for all \(x\in\mathcal{O}_k\), which is the result we sought to prove.

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

  • Access over 3 million high quality textbook solutions
  • Access our popular flashcard, quiz, mock-exam and notes features
  • Access our smart AI features to upgrade your learning
Get Vaia Premium now
Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chapter 4

(a) Show that for systems of dimension one: \(\dot{x}=f(x, u), x=\) \(\mathbb{R}\), the accessibility rank condition holds at a state \(x^{0}\) if and only if \(\mathcal{R}\left(x^{0}\right)\) has a nonempty interior. (b) Consider the following system with \(\mathcal{X}=\mathbb{R}^{2}\) and \(\mathcal{U}=\mathbb{R}^{2}\) : $$ \begin{aligned} &\dot{x}_{1}=u_{1} \\ &\dot{x}_{2}=\varphi\left(x_{1}\right) u_{2} \end{aligned} $$ where \(\varphi: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is a \(C^{\infty}\) function with the property that \(\varphi(z) \neq 0\) for each \(z \neq 0\) but \(\frac{d^{j} \varphi}{d z^{j}}(0)=0\) for all \(j=0,1,2, \ldots\) (for instance, \(\varphi(z):=e^{-1 / z^{2}}\) for \(z \neq 0, \varphi(0):=0)\). Show that, for all \(x^{0}, x^{0} \in\) int $\mathcal{R}_{\mathcal{V}}^{\leq T}\left(x^{0}\right)$, but, on the other hand, the accessibility rank condition does not hold at the points of the form \(\left(0, x_{2}\right)\).

Chapter 4

Suppose \(X\) and \(Y\) are analytic vector fields defined on \(\mathcal{O}\). For any \(x^{0} \in \mathcal{O}\), let $\mathcal{I}=\mathcal{I}_{X, x^{0}}:=\left\\{t \in \mathbb{R} \mid\left(t, x^{0}\right) \in \mathcal{D}_{X}\right\\}\(. Then, the function \)\gamma: \mathcal{I} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n}: t \mapsto \operatorname{Ad}_{t X} Y\left(x^{0}\right)$ is analytic. Proof. Let $\alpha(t):=\left(e^{-t X}\right),\left(e^{t X} x^{0}\right)\(, seen as a function \)\mathcal{I} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}\(. Note that \)\alpha(0)=I$, and that, by Equation (4.28), the vector \(\left(e^{t X} x^{0}, \alpha(t)\right)\) is the solution of the differential equation $$ \begin{array}{lll} \dot{x}(t) & =X(x(t)) & x(0) & =x^{0} \\ \dot{\alpha}(t) & =-\alpha(t) \cdot X_{*}(x(t)) & & \alpha(0)=1 . \end{array} $$ This is a differential equation with analytic right-hand side, so \(x(\cdot)\) and \(\alpha(\cdot)\) are both analytic (see, for instance, Proposition C.3.12). Then, \(\gamma(t)=\alpha(t) Y(x(t))\) is also analytic.

Chapter 4

Consider a model for the "shopping cart" shown in Figure 4.2 ("knife-edge" or "unicycle" are other names for this example). The state is given by the orientation \(\theta\), together with the coordinates \(x_{1}, x_{2}\) of the midpoint between the back wheels. Figure 4.2: Shopping cart. The front wheel is a castor, free to rotate. There is a non-slipping constraint on movement: the velocity $\left(\dot{x}_{1}, \dot{x}_{2}\right)^{\prime}\( must be parallel to the vector \)(\cos \theta, \sin \theta)^{\prime} .$ This leads to the following equations: $$ \begin{aligned} \dot{x}_{1} &=u_{1} \cos \theta \\ \dot{x}_{2} &=u_{1} \sin \theta \\ \dot{\theta} &=u_{2} \end{aligned} $$ where we may view \(u_{1}\) as a "drive" command and \(u_{2}\) as a steering control (in practice, we implement these controls by means of differential forces on the two back corners of the cart). We view the system as having state space \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) (a more accurate state space would be the manifold \(\mathbb{R}^{2} \times \mathbb{S}^{1}\) ). (a) Show that the system is completely controllable. (b) Consider these new variables: $z_{1}:=\theta, z_{2}:=x_{1} \cos \theta+x_{2} \sin \theta, z_{3}:=\( \)x_{1} \sin \theta-x_{2} \cos \theta, v_{1}:=u_{2}\(, and \)v_{2}:=u_{1}-u_{2} z_{3}$. (Such a change of variables is called a "feedback transformation".) Write the system in these variables, as \(\dot{z}=\widetilde{f}(z, v) .\) Note that this is one of the systems \(\Sigma_{i}\) in Exercise 4.3.14. Explain why controllability can then be deduced from what you already concluded in that previous exercise.

Chapter 4

Suppose that \(\Delta=\Delta_{f_{1}, \ldots, f_{r}}\) has constant rank \(r\), and let \(X \in\) \(\mathbb{V}(\mathcal{O})\). Then, the following two properties are equivalent: 1\. \(\Delta\) is invariant under \(X\). 2\. Let \(\mathcal{O}_{1}\) be an open subset of \(\mathcal{O}\) and let $t \in \mathbb{R}\( be so that \)(t, x) \in \mathcal{D}_{X}\( for all \)x \in \mathcal{O}_{1}\(. Define \)\mathcal{O}_{0}:=e^{t X} \mathcal{O}_{1}$. Assume that \(Y \in \mathrm{V}\left(\mathcal{O}_{0}\right)\) is such that $Y(z) \in \Delta(z)\( for each \)z \in \mathcal{O}_{0}\(. Then, \)\operatorname{Ad}_{t X} Y(x) \in \Delta(x)\( for each \)x \in \mathcal{O}_{1}$.

Chapter 4

Let \(X \in \mathbb{V}(\mathcal{O})\) and $\left(t^{0}, x^{0}\right) \in \mathcal{D}_{X}\(. Pick any \)Y \in \mathbb{V}\left(\mathcal{O}_{Y}\right)$ such that \(e^{t^{0} X} x^{0} \in \mathcal{O}_{Y}\). Then, $$ \left.\frac{\partial \operatorname{Ad}_{t X} Y\left(x^{0}\right)}{\partial t}\right|_{t=t^{0}}=\operatorname{Ad}_{t^{0} X}[X, Y]\left(x^{0}\right) . $$ Proof. We have, for all \((t, x) \in \mathcal{D}_{X}, e^{-t X} e^{t X} x=x\), so taking \(\partial / \partial x\) there results $$ \left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x)=I $$ and, taking \(\partial / \partial t\), $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right)\right) \cdot\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x)+\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x)\right)=0 .$ On the other hand, $$ \begin{aligned} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x)\right) &=\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(e^{t X} x\right)=\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \\ &=\frac{\partial}{\partial x} X\left(e^{t X} x\right)=X_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x) \end{aligned} $$ so substituting in (4.27) and postmultiplying by $\left(\left(e^{t X}\right)_{*}(x)\right)^{-1}$ there results the identity: $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right)\right)=-\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot X_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) . $$ Thus, $$ \begin{gathered} \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot Y\left(e^{t X} x\right)\right) \\ =-\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot X_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot Y\left(e^{t X} x\right) \\ +\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot Y_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot X\left(e^{t X} x\right) \\ =\left(e^{-t X}\right)_{*}\left(e^{t X} x\right) \cdot[X, Y]\left(e^{t X} x\right) \end{gathered} $$ as required. A generalization to higher-order derivatives is as follows; it can be interpreted, in a formal sense, as saying that $\operatorname{Ad}_{t X}=e^{t a d x}\(. For each \)k=0,1, \ldots\(, and each vector fields \)X, Y$, we denote \(\operatorname{ad}_{X}^{0} Y=Y\) and $\operatorname{ad}_{X}^{k+1} Y:=\operatorname{ad}_{X}\left(\operatorname{ad}_{X}^{k} Y\right)$.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place.

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Smart Note-Taking
  • Mock-Exams
  • Study Planner
Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks