Americas
Europe
Problem 18
Show that \(\overline{E Q_{\mathrm{TM}}}\) is recognizable by a Turing machine with an oracle for \(A_{\mathrm{TM}}\).
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.
Prove that there exist two languages \(A\) and \(B\) that are Turing-incomparable- that is, where \(A \not{Z} \mathrm{~T} B\) and \(B \not \mathrm{T} A\).
In Corollary \(4.18\), we showed that the set of all languages is uncountable. Use this result to prove that languages exist that are not recognizable by an oracle Turing machine with an oracle for \(A_{\mathrm{TM}}\).
Give a model of the sentence $$ \begin{aligned} \phi_{e q}=& \forall x\left[R_{1}(x, x)\right] \\ & \wedge \forall x, y\left[R_{1}(x, y) \leftrightarrow R_{1}(y, x)\right] \\ & \wedge \forall x, y, z\left[\left(R_{1}(x, y) \wedge R_{1}(y, z)\right) \rightarrow R_{1}(x, z)\right] \end{aligned} $$
\({ }^{*} 6.17\) Let \(A\) and \(B\) be two disjoint languages. Say that language \(C\) separates \(A\) and \(B\) if \(A \subseteq C\) and \(B \subseteq \bar{C} .\) Describe two disjoint Turing-recognizable languages that aren't separable by any decidable language.
Describe two different Turing machines, \(M\) and \(N\), where \(M\) outputs \(\langle N\rangle\) and \(N\) outputs \(\langle M\rangle\), when started on any input.
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place.