Open in App
Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:

Show that the collection of decidable languages is closed under the operation of A. union. d. complementation. b. concatenation. e. intersection. c. star.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The collection of decidable languages is closed under the operation of union, complementation, concatenation, intersection, and star. Given decidable languages \(L_1\) and \(L_2\), we can construct Turing Machines which decide \(L_1 \cup L_2\), \(L_1^C\), \(L_1 \cdot L_2\), \(L_1 \cap L_2\), and \(L^*\) respectively, by running the input through TMs for individual languages in parallel and modifying the acceptance conditions accordingly. Thus, the resulting languages are also decidable.
See the step by step solution

Step by step solution

Unlock all solutions

Get unlimited access to millions of textbook solutions with Vaia Premium

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Step 1: A. Proof for Union

Given decidable languages \(L_1\) and \(L_2\), we can construct a Turing Machine (TM) \(M\) which decides \(L = L_1 \cup L_2\). TM \(M\) can be constructed by running TM \(M_1\) for \(L_1\) and TM \(M_2\) for \(L_2\) in parallel on the input \(w\). If either \(M_1\) or \(M_2\) accepts, \(M\) accepts. If both \(M_1\) and \(M_2\) reject, \(M\) rejects. Hence, the language \(L_1 \cup L_2\) is also decidable.

Step 2: B. Proof for Complementation

Given a decidable language \(L\), we can construct a TM \(M_L'\) that decides the complement of \(L\). TM \(M_L'\) can be constructed by running the TM \(M_L\) for \(L\) and switching the accept and reject states. If \(M_L\) accepts, \(M_L'\) rejects and vice versa. Hence, the complement of \(L\) is decidable.

Step 3: C. Proof for Concatenation

If we are given two decidable languages \(L_1\) and \(L_2\), we can construct a Turing Machine \(M\) that decides \(L = L_1 \cdot L_2\). TM \(M\) can be constructed by running TM \(M_1\) for \(L_1\) and TM \(M_2\) for \(L_2\) on all possible partitions (of \(w\) into \(x\) and \(y\)) in parallel. If \(M_1\) accepts \(x\) and \(M_2\) accepts \(y\), \(M\) accepts \(w\). Otherwise, \(M\) rejects \(w\). Thus, the language of \(L_1 \cdot L_2\) is decidable.

Step 4: D. Proof for Intersection

Given two decidable languages \(L_1\) and \(L_2\), we can construct a Turing Machine \(M\) which decides \(L = L_1 \cap L_2\). TM M can be constructed by running TM \(M_1\) for \(L_1\) and TM \(M_2\) for \(L_2\) in parallel on the input \(w\). If both \(M_1\) and \(M_2\) accept, \(M\) accepts. If either \(M_1\) or \(M_2\) rejects, \(M\) rejects. Hence, \(L_1 \cap L_2\) is decidable.

Step 5: E. Proof for Star Operation

For a decidable language \(L\), we construct a Turing machine \(M\) which decides \(L^{*}\), the set of all strings that can be made by concatenating zero or more strings from \(L\). For an input string \(w\), construct \(M\) to enumerate over all the possible ways to split \(w\) into substrings \(w_1, w_2, ..., w_k\) and run the Turing machine \(M_L\) for \(L\) on all these substrings in parallel. If \(M_L\) accepts all \(w_i\), \(M\) accepts \(w\). If \(M_L\) rejects any one of the \(w_i\), \(M\) rejects \(w\). Thus, \(L^{*}\) is decidable.

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

  • Access over 3 million high quality textbook solutions
  • Access our popular flashcard, quiz, mock-exam and notes features
  • Access our smart AI features to upgrade your learning
Get Vaia Premium now
Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chapter 3

In Theorem \(3.21\), we showed that a language is Turing-recognizable iff some enumerator enumerates it. Why didn't we use the following simpler algorithm for the forward direction of the proof? As before, \(s_{1}, s_{2}, \ldots\) is a list of all strings in \(\Sigma^{*}\). \(E={ }^{*}\) Ignore the input. 1\. Repeat the following for \(i=1,2,3, \ldots\) 2\. Run \(M\) on \(s_{i}\). 3\. If it accepts, print out \(s_{i} . "\)

Chapter 3

Give implementation-level descriptions of Turing machines that decide the following languages over the alphabet \(\\{0,1\\}\). A a. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains an equal number of 0 and 1 s \(\\}\) b. \(\\{w \mid w\) contains twice as many 0 s as 1 s \(\\}\) c. \(\\{w \mid w\) does not contain twice as many \(0 \mathrm{~s}\) as $1 \mathrm{~s}\\}$

Chapter 3

Examine the formal definition of a Turing machine to answer the following questions, and explain your reasoning. a. Can a Turing machine ever write the blank symbol \(\lrcorner\) on its tape? b. Can the tape alphabet \(\Gamma\) be the same as the input alphabet \(\Sigma\) ? c. Can a Turing machine's head ever be in the same location in two successive steps? d. Can a Turing machine contain just a single state?

Chapter 3

Let \(c_{1} x^{n}+c_{2} x^{n-1}+\cdots+c_{n} x+c_{n+1}\) be a polynomial with a root at \(x=x_{0}\). Let \(c_{\max }\) be the largest absolute value of a \(c_{i}\). Show that $$ \left|x_{0}\right|<(n+1) \frac{c_{\mathrm{max}}}{\left|c_{1}\right|} $$

Chapter 3

(a) For any two decidable languages \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2}\), let \(M_{1}\) and \(M_{2}\) be the TMs that decide them. We construct a $\operatorname{TM} M^{\prime}\( that decides the union of \)L_{1}\( and \)L_{2}$ : "On input w: 1\. Run \(M_{1}\) on \(w\). If it accepts, accept. 2\. Run \(M_{2}\) on \(w\). If it accepts, accept. Otherwise, reject." \(M^{\prime}\) accepts \(w\) if either \(M_{1}\) or \(M_{2}\) accepts it. If both reject, \(M^{\prime}\) rejects.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place.

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Smart Note-Taking
  • Mock-Exams
  • Study Planner
Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks