Open in App
Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:

Prove that for any integer \(p>1\), if \(p\) isn't pseudoprime, then \(p\) fails the Fermat test for at least half of all numbers in \(\mathcal{Z}_{p}^{+}\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
If 'p>1' is not a pseudoprime, then it fails the Fermat test for at least half of all integers in \(Z_p^+\). The key idea to prove this result is showing that at least half of the integers in this multiplicative group have at least one factor that is not coprime with 'p'. Through the relations between the Fermat test, Euler's totient function, and the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we can systematically count these failing elements and reach the desired conclusion.
See the step by step solution

Step by step solution

Unlock all solutions

Get unlimited access to millions of textbook solutions with Vaia Premium

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Step 1: Understanding Zp^+

Zp^+ represents the multiplicative group of integer numbers modulo 'p' greater than 1. By definition, all elements in Zp^+ must have a gcd (greatest common divisor) of 1 with 'p', which means they are coprime with 'p'. Let's denote the size of this multiplicative group by φ(p), also known as the Euler's totient function.

Step 2: Defining the Fermat test

Given an integer 'a' (1 < a < p) and an odd prime 'p', the Fermat test states that if \(a^{p-1} \equiv 1\) (mod p), then 'p' might be a prime number (or not - in that case, 'p' is called a pseudoprime). If the congruence doesn't hold true for some 'a', then 'p' is definitely composite.

Step 3: Relating the Fermat test to Euler's totient function

According to Euler's theorem, if 'a' and 'p' are coprime, then \(a^{\varphi{(p)}} \equiv 1\) (mod p). For a prime number, φ(p) = p - 1, so we obtain Fermat's theorem. This congruence is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for 'p' to be prime.

Step 4: Using the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT)

If 'p' (not necessarily prime) fails the Fermat test, then at least one element 'a' in Zp^+ does not satisfy \(a^{p-1} \equiv 1\) (mod p). By CRT, we know that there exists at least one such element 'a' for each factor of 'p'. To give a concrete example, if 'p=35', then we have a = [3,9,12,21].

Step 5: Counting the failing elements in Zp^+

Consider the elements in Zp^+ that fail the Fermat test. These elements have at least one factor which is not coprime to 'p'. Their count is thus at least equal to the sum of the counts of elements in the cosets modulo 'p', for all prime factors of 'p'. This count will be half of the total count or more, because each such coset has a distinct residue class modulo p, and the primes are exclusive.

Step 6: Conclusion

If 'p>'1' is not a pseudoprime, then it fails the Fermat test for at least half of all integers in Zp^+. The key idea to prove this result is showing that at least half of the integers in this multiplicative group have at least one factor that is not coprime with 'p'. Through the relations between the Fermat test, Euler's totient function, and the Chinese Remainder Theorem, we can systematically count these failing elements and reach the desired conclusion.

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

  • Access over 3 million high quality textbook solutions
  • Access our popular flashcard, quiz, mock-exam and notes features
  • Access our smart AI features to upgrade your learning
Get Vaia Premium now
Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place.

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Smart Note-Taking
  • Mock-Exams
  • Study Planner
Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks