Open in App
Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:

Problem 100

Your television advertising campaign seems to have been very persuasive: 10,000 people who saw the ad purchased your product, while only 2,000 people purchased the produc without seeing the ad. Explain how additional data could show that your ad campaign was, in fact, unpersuasive.

Short Answer

Expert verified
In order to evaluate whether the ad campaign was persuasive or not, additional data, such as the total number of people who did not purchase the product and potential differences in the target audiences, must be considered. While the purchase rates of 10% for those who saw the ad and 4% for those who didn't may initially suggest the campaign's effectiveness, it is possible that other external factors or pre-existing inclinations of the audience may have played a role in their decision to buy the product. A more in-depth analysis is necessary to determine the true impact of the advertising campaign.
See the step by step solution

Step by step solution

Unlock all solutions

Get unlimited access to millions of textbook solutions with Vaia Premium

Over 22 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Step 1: Identify Possible Additional Data

To disprove the effectiveness of the advertising campaign, we must look for additional data that could suggest other factors that could have contributed to the difference in sales. Some possible data points to consider include the total number of people who saw the ad and didn't buy the product, the total number of people who didn't see the ad and didn't buy the product, and external factors such as price changes, seasonality, or market trends.

Step 2: Develop a Hypothetical Scenario

Let's develop a hypothetical scenario to examine how the ad campaign could have been less effective than it initially seems. Suppose we have the following data: 1. Total number of people who saw the ad and purchased the product: 10,000 2. Total number of people who saw the ad and didn't purchase the product: 90,000 3. Total number of people who didn't see the ad and purchased the product: 2,000 4. Total number of people who didn't see the ad and didn't purchase the product: 48,000 5. No significant price changes, seasonality, or market trends during the campaign

Step 3: Calculate Purchase Rates

Next, we need to calculate the purchase rates for people who saw the ad and those who didn't see the ad. Purchase rate for people who saw the ad: \[\frac{10,000}{10,000+90,000}\times100\% = \frac{10,000}{100,000}\times100\% = 10\%\] Purchase rate for people who didn't see the ad: \[\frac{2,000}{2,000+48,000}\times100\% = \frac{2,000}{50,000}\times100\% = 4\%\]

Step 4: Analyzing the Results

By comparing the purchase rates (10% for those who saw the ad and 4% for those who didn't), it might initially seem that the ad campaign was effective. However, we must consider other possible explanations for this difference. One possibility is that the people who saw the ad were already more inclined to purchase the product, due to factors such as their demographics, interests, or prior exposure to the brand. In this scenario, the ad would not have significantly increased their likelihood of buying the product. In other words, the difference in purchase rates might be due to differences in the target audiences rather than the ad's persuasiveness.

Step 5: Conclusion

Although the given data seems to suggest the ad campaign was successful, additional data, such as the total number of people who did not purchase the product, could show that the difference in purchase rates may be due to other factors. A more in-depth analysis of the target audiences and other external factors is needed to evaluate the true effectiveness of the ad campaign.

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

  • Access over 3 million high quality textbook solutions
  • Access our popular flashcard, quiz, mock-exam and notes features
  • Access our smart AI features to upgrade your learning
Get Vaia Premium now
Access millions of textbook solutions in one place

Most popular questions from this chapter

Chapter 7

Complete the following sentence. Two events \(E\) and \(F\) are mutually exclusive if their intersection is

Chapter 7

If \(A \subseteq B\) and \(P(B) \neq 0\), why is \(P(A \mid B)=\frac{P(A)}{P(B)} ?\)

Chapter 7

\- Construct a four-state Markov system so that both \([.5 .500]\) and \(\left[\begin{array}{ll}0 & 0.5 .5\end{array}\right]\) are steady-state vectors. HINT [Try one in which no arrows link the first two states to the last two.]

Chapter 7

Concern the following chart, which shows the way in which a dog moves its facial muscles when torn between the drives of fight and flight. \({ }^{4}\) The "fight" drive increases from left to right; the "fight" drive increases from top to bottom. (Notice that an increase in the "fight" drive causes its upper lip to lift, while an increase in the "flight" drive draws its ears downward.) \(\nabla\) Let \(E\) be the event that the dog's flight drive is the strongest, let \(F\) be the event that the dog's flight drive is weakest, let \(G\) be the event that the dog's fight drive is the strongest, and let \(H\) be the event that the dog's fight drive is weakest. Describe the following events in terms of \(E, F, G\), and \(H\) using the symbols \(\cap, \cup\), and \(^{\prime} .\) a. The dog's flight drive is weakest and its fight drive is not weakest. b. The dog's flight drive is not strongest or its fight drive is weakest. c. Either the dog's flight drive or its fight drive fails to be strongest.

Chapter 7

If higher and higher powers of \(P\) approach a fixed matrix \(Q\), explain why the rows of \(Q\) must be steady-state distributions vectors.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place.

  • Flashcards & Quizzes
  • AI Study Assistant
  • Smart Note-Taking
  • Mock-Exams
  • Study Planner
Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App Join over 22 million students in learning with our Vaia App

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks