Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenOur world is rich and diverse, full of people with different identities and interesting stories to tell. Unfortunately, sometimes our differences can be used to set us apart in negative ways.
Here, we'll be exploring the different dimensions of inequality that sociologists analyse regarding the identity markers of social class, age, ethnicity, gender, and disability.
There are various ways of approaching the concept of inequality as it applies to different social, cultural, and political contexts.
According to the Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (p.286), inequality is defined as...
…the unequal distribution of opportunities, rewards and power among and between individuals, households and groups".
In sociology, there are two main questions concerning the distribution of inequality:
inequalities of outcomes (who gets what?), and
inequalities of opportunities (who does what?)
Of course, scholars from different fields will have different opinions on which types of inequality are more prominent than others. Generally, the following types of inequality are closely studied:
The study of inequalities is an important topic within the subject of stratification and differentiation.
It is imperative to note that social stratification and social inequality are not the same! Stratification refers to the idea that inequalities are built into societal structures. Inequality refers specifically to the uneven distribution of resources and opportunities.
This distinction is important because it impacts how sociologists theorise the relationship between the two concepts. The big theoretical question here concerns the causes and effects of these processes: does inequality cause social stratification, or is it just a way of statistically classifying inequality?
Studying the dimensions of inequality is a solution to this sociological problem.
Besides highlighting the various types of existing inequalities, examining how they operate differently across multiple dimensions is important. Inequality can be caused by discrimination, and we will look at that below. Let's explore the explanations of differences in life chances across the multiple dimensions of inequality.
The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (p.338) defines life chances as
"the access that an individual has to valued social and economic goods such as education, health care or high income".
We will go through each dimension of inequality in turn.
However, you should note that the following section covers the dimensions of inequality in overview only - you'll find separate explanations on each of the dimensions (social class, ethnicity, gender, age and disability) that go into the topic in greater detail.
Karl Marx and Max Weber paved the way for the study of inequality by social class. They believed that economic and status inequalities (in the form of their relationship to the means of production) characterise modern society - that a person's life chances are structurally determined by their class position.
However, Weber criticised Marx's economic determinism, highlighting that other aspects of social life are also deeply influential in shaping a person's life chances. Marxist and Weberian approaches have been extended to examine the impact of ethnicity, gender, age and disability upon people's experiences of health, education and work.
John Westergaard and Henrietta Resler (1976) stated that economic ownership is the source of power in society - and the reason the ruling class can maintain so much power is that the state protects its interests through legislation (such as property laws).
David Lockwood (1966) extends this view and highlights the symbolic dimension of social class identification. Lockwood believes that people assign themselves to social classes based on their relative experiences with power.
Many scholars criticise Marxism for its reductionism because it does not consider the impact of other cultural inequalities both with and upon economic factors.
The distribution of health and illness is closely correlated with structural matters of wealth and poverty. Many studies have found that ethnic minorities have poorer health than the White population in Britain. This is due to the established link between having an ethnic minority background and being more likely to experience social deprivation and poverty and racial prejudice from individuals and systems.
African-Caribbean youth are very likely to approach mental health services - but this is mainly because they are put in touch through the criminal justice system, which disproportionately targets ethnic minorities.
Many studies have found that ethnic minorities generally tend to score relatively low GCSE grades due to poor family and living conditions. However, ethnic minority students consider their parents' experiences of discrimination and disadvantage as a sign that they need to work very hard to achieve similar prospects to their White peers. This makes ethnic minority groups, such as Pakistani and Bangladeshi students, much more likely to complete their A-Levels and university degrees.
Despite this, they are still more vulnerable to poverty and unemployment in the future.
Miles (1980) states that implications for chances exist in terms of social class and ethnicity. He posits that ethnic minorities are subjected to discriminatory treatment regardless of their position in the class system.
Similarly, Rex and Tomlinson's (1979) study of Handsworth, Birmingham concluded that ethnic minority groups make up a large proportion of the working-class population, resulting in differential life chances.
Tariq Modood and Nabil Khattab (2015) found that ethnic minorities pre-emptively avoid expected workplace discrimination through strategies like self-employment. So, labour market differences by ethnicity can be attributed both to discrimination itself and to people's responses to it.
By the very nature of patriarchy, women generally have fewer life chances than men. However, it is important to note that there are within-group differences, too, in that some women have better life chances than other women and other men (taking into account factors of social class, ethnicity, and more).
Across all social classes, women are more likely to have health insurance than men. However, this is not indicative of overall equality. In fact, in the United States, women pay more for their premiums per month, as gender discrimination against insurance policy owners remains legal across most states.
While men generally have lower life expectancies, women are statistically more likely to suffer from non-terminal, long-term illnesses.
Sue Sharpe (1976, 1994) studied young schoolgirls' aspirations in education, work and marriage. In the first study, their priorities involved marriage and love, with 'career' being placed relatively low on their lists. However, in 1996, schoolgirls' aspirations were more inclined to a career and financial independence.
Jon Swain's (2006) study on Masculinities in Education is one of many that reveals that the educational environment is much better suited to female socialisation and behaviours. Teachers tend to have lower expectations from male students, and when these are not fulfilled, they tend to punish them instead of helping them. This often results in schoolboys reacting negatively, joining anti-school subcultures and falling behind on their academics.
R. D. Barron and G. M. Norris (1976) suggest the existence of a dual labour market, which consists of two interrelated but separate employment sectors:
Barron and Norris (1976) point out that men are mostly employed in the primary sector, while women primarily work in the secondary sector. Women are more likely to accept lower pay, as they require a degree of flexibility to manage both work and expressive household responsibilities (such as child-rearing).
Ageism impacts both the young and the elderly in different ways. This signals the occurrence of intragenerational mobility. It is difficult to examine the different types of inequality in conventional ways for the dimension of age.
Intragenerational mobility refers to changes in an individual's social status throughout life. For example, someone with a lower-class background in childhood might do very well in school and earn a middle-class job when they grow up.
Take note of the difference between intragenerational and intergenerational mobility. The latter refers to differences in social class positions taken by family members across multiple generations.
Philippe Aries (1962) suggested that childhood is a social construction and a product of industrialisation and modernisation. In pre-industrial society, children who were no longer physically dependent were treated no differently than their parents in terms of work, censorship or punishment from the law. Nowadays, young children are likely to experience major inequalities, with little to no opportunities to defend themselves.
Increasing life expectancies have implications for society's dependency ratio, and many worry that the ageing population will result in an increased burden on healthcare systems in the future.
Sociologists see an elderly individual's health status as a reflection of their life experiences thus far. This is proven by statistics showing that those with lower social status are likely to age with more health problems and a lower life expectancy.
Moreover, financial shocks from the past decade mean pensions are less and less adequate. Many older people find it necessary to extend their working lives. However, they also face the problem of intergenerational disentitlement, in which older people are less likely to be trained, promoted or hired than younger workers.
Talcott Parsons (1942) states that cutting ties from their jobs means that the elderly often also cut ties with society more broadly. This is because work provides a sense of residence and status within a particular community, resulting in the elderly becoming isolated from occupational and kinship ties once retired.
From a sociological perspective, disability is a combination of the biology of the injury and the social, economic, and political experience that goes with it.
Ramune Adomaitiene (1999) claims that those with disabilities face a lack of facilities, unequal access to important resources, and institutional discrimination in education, welfare, media, the workplace, and more. This discrimination is referred to as ableism.
Merriam-Webster defines ableism as "discrimination or prejudice against individuals with disabilities".
Vic Finkelstein (1993) theorises that the life chances of people with disabilities have a lot to do with how they identify themselves. He states that when people with disabilities see themselves as suffering due to impairment, the call for assistance becomes normalised.
However, when people with disabilities see themselves as suffering due to discrimination resulting from their impairment, measures for equality of opportunity become more normalised.
There is evidence that people with disabilities face significant discrimination within the healthcare system.
As is the case with other dimensions of inequality, illnesses are often downplayed by medical health professionals when it comes to minority groups. As such, people with disabilities often experience health disparities not because of their condition, but because of the inherent, unrecognised ableism of individuals and institutions.
Tom Shakespeare (2005) reports that schooling is insufficient for people with disabilities to gain the qualifications required for higher education and employment.
Another common occurrence is that, even if they do obtain their degrees, people with disabilities are often deterred from advancing in their careers due to discrimination from employers. This discrimination is prevalent in many forms, including:
Mike Oliver and Colin Barnes (2010) study the struggles that people with disabilities face in finding meaningful inclusion in the workplace. People with disabilities are much more vulnerable to poverty, as many only live on government disability support.
It's extremely important not to forget that the various dimensions of inequality intersect to create unique life chances and experiences. For example, a lower-class, white woman with a disability will be subject to very different life chances than an upper-class, Black man with no disability.
So, remember to consider that these social dimensions don't act alone - that experiences of inequality are complex and should be studied as such.
Different dimensions of inequality affect people in their cultural, economic, social, and political lives. Inequalities also impact people's life chances in that they often have different levels of access to the opportunities and resources that are valued by society.
There are many dimensions of social inequality, including social class, ethnicity, gender, age, and disability.
There are many different types of inequality, depending on the perspective they are being examined by. For Weber, the three main types of inequality are based on class, status, and power.
Three examples of inequality are inequality based on:
Inequality can be caused by discrimination and structural disadvantages.
What is the definition of gender inequality?
The unfair treatment between genders in society. Gender inequality within sociology looks at the discrimination between genders and how they are interpreted.
Why is gender inequality an issue?
Gender inequality is an issue in society because it allows unfair treatment of people based on their gender.
What are the 3 main places of inequalities within society?
The 3 main places of inequalities are found in the workplace, education systems and in healthcare.
What did the National Statistics Office find about the gender pay gap in 2021?
The gender pay gap is up to 7.9% as of April 2021, compared with 7.0% in 2020.
What was Dunscombe and Marsden's 'triple shift'?
This is where women are expected to perform 3 roles in the household: housework, paid work and emotional work. However, it was found that they don't receive credit for anything besides paid work as it's seen as their 'role' in a patriarchal society.
What did a UK government survey find out about the unpaid work women did?
Women complete more unpaid work than men. With domestic tasks such as laundry and childcare, women completed over double what men did in a week.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of Vaia.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in