The terms gender, sex, and sexuality are used every single day. They're part of very important conversations people are having with their families, on social media, and even within governments. While the conflation of these three concepts is a significant factor in these conversations, it isn't necessarily correct.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenNie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenThe terms gender, sex, and sexuality are used every single day. They're part of very important conversations people are having with their families, on social media, and even within governments. While the conflation of these three concepts is a significant factor in these conversations, it isn't necessarily correct.
Let's try our hand at deconstructing it.
Although there is a separate study set specifically dedicated to exploring the concept of gender on Vaia, it is important to start any relevant explanation by refreshing our understanding of the difference between sex and gender.
The conflation of sex and gender is a common mistake - it persists in academics, in bureaucracy, and even in popular discourse.
Sex refers to the biological and/or physiological characteristics that distinguish 'males' from 'females'.
On the other hand, gender refers to the social, cultural, and personal expressions that society has historically assigned as being typically 'masculine' or 'feminine'.
Upon a close reading of the definition of 'gender', it's not difficult to see that the concept is a social construction. There are a few occurrences that can confirm this:
The concept of sexuality as distinct from sex and gender was made popular by Simone de Beauvoir, who argued that women are not born but are 'made'. Further contributions were made by famous scholars such as Sigmund Freud, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Lacan, who identified the link between sexuality and the self.
Sex refers to the biological characteristics that lead to them being assigned either 'male' or 'female'.
Sexuality refers to a person's capacity for sexual feelings. Note that this is different from sexual orientation, which references the gender(s) to which someone is sexually attracted (such as homosexual or bisexual).
In sociology, the study of sex and sexuality focuses on sexual attitudes and practices instead of the physiological or biological understandings of these concepts.
Even though sexuality is a universal cultural phenomenon, different periods and cultures experience and express it very differently. Whether this concerns sexual consent, homosexuality, masturbation, or premarital sex, attitudes toward all of these practices are historically and culturally contingent.
However, sociologists have found that certain sexual attitudes and practices transcend borders, such as incest and extramarital sex.
The norms, values, and dominant ideologies of a society determine the types of sexual attitudes and practices that are normalized in that society. The avenues for this process of normalization are primary and secondary socialization, whereby people learn and adopt a society's key norms and values through their family, education, workplace, religion, media, and beyond.
For example, countries such as Finland and Sweden are known to be more open when it comes to sexual attitudes, practices, and overall sexual freedom, with countries characterized by more conservative ideologies, such as China and Iran, falling on the other end of the spectrum.
The relationship between sex and sexuality begins to stand out when we closely examine the legislature governing each concept.
The United States has legally and/or institutionally restricted sexual activity much more than other industrialized countries. For example, many American citizens disapprove of sex before age 16, extramarital sex, and homosexuality.
Female sexuality is particularly restricted and disapproved of in U.S. society. There is a double standard when it comes to attitudes about premarital male and female sexuality - particularly outside a committed relationship - whereby the former is congratulated, and the latter is often stigmatized. This results in women having, on average, significantly fewer sexual partners than men throughout their lifetimes.
While younger generations take on new ideas and perceptions of sex and sexuality, some dominant ideologies remain - particularly those regarding monogamous relationships and eventually 'settling down' in the future.
Despite the rapid modernization of several countries around the world, progressive ideas about sex lag far behind. A subject of debate in the United States is not whether sex education should be taught in schools, but what kind of sex education should be taught.
A key issue in sex education is teaching safe sexual practices. There are different approaches to this, such as:
encouraging complete abstinence from sex.
an abstinence-plus approach, where abstinence is the best method, but safe-sex practices are still taught,
focusing on responsible and safe sex without an emphasis on abstinence.
Sweden is well known for its comprehensive sex education programs in public schools, which focuses on safe sex without an emphasis on abstinence. The effectiveness of this program is reflected in several statistics - for instance, the teenage birthrate and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are significantly lower in Sweden than they are in the United States.
As we know, theoretical perspectives are the building blocks of sociology. As such, they all approach topics in unique ways. Let's take a look at the various theories on sex and sexuality.
Functionalists see the family as the most important source of social cohesion and stability in society. As such, functionalists suggest that sexual behavior needs to be regulated in order to main social stability in the context of marriage and family.
Talcott Parsons (1955) is a functionalist theorist who has long defended the nuclear family and the traditional gender roles that it promotes. He suggests that it is not only important to regulate their sexual activity for the sake of the family, but also that the family should conduct this regulation in itself. This involves discouraging sexual activity outside the family unit (such as premarital or extramarital sex). To this end, the bond of the married couple is strengthened and, as a result, so are the processes of socialization for their offspring.
Conflict theorists suggest that sexuality is just one more domain where power and oppression can be exercised. Those who take up the dominant view and/or identity (in this case, cisgender heterosexuals) have the power to influence systems and structures which can replicate that worldview on a large scale.
A key example of the link between sexuality and power is the debate on the legalization of same-sex marriage in several parts of the world. This debate is often backed by two dimensions:
Interactionists study the meanings that people attach to concepts - in this case, the concepts of sex and sexuality. To this end, they find that masculinity and heterosexuality are the symbolic norms in American society.
It has only been around 50 years since the American Psychological Association dismissed the definition of homosexuality as a pathological disorder in 1973. This has had a lasting impact on societal attitudes towards homosexuality - something which is well described by the interactionist theory of labeling.
Symbolic interactionists also look at the devaluation of femininity to better understand attitudes towards sex and sexuality in society. They suggest that people often use slurs to feminize gay people, particularly men, in a derogatory way, labeling them as 'hypersexual', which can often lead to members of the LGBTQ+ community establishing negative self-images and dislike towards themselves.
This occurrence can be understood using Charles Cooley's (1902) concept of the looking-glass self, which describes how external labels impact people's perceptions of themselves.
Queer theory is an interdisciplinary perspective focused on dismantling traditional, essentialist ideas of sex, sexuality, and gender. This is done by examining the several ways in which biological sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation are not inherently interlinked in the lived experience.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick was a very influential queer theorist. She argued that someone's sexuality cannot simply be reduced to the sex of their desired partner. There are many other ways of understanding sexualities. Below is a list of some of those.
How influential is sexuality in someone's overall self-identity?
The role that sex plays in individuals' lives, in terms of how they think about it, how they feel about it, and how important it is to them.
The extent to which people situate themselves into the dominant paradigm of gendered activities and meanings.
As we can see, a key aim of queer theory is to situate our current understandings of sex and sexuality and to open up new avenues and perspectives for understanding these concepts.
Sex refers to the biological characteristics that lead to them being assigned either 'male' or 'female'.
Sexuality refers to a person's capacity for sexual feelings. Note that this is different from sexual orientation, which references the gender(s) to which someone is sexually attracted (such as homosexual or bisexual).
There are different perspectives on the key components of sexuality. The most common ones are biological sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and social sex role.
Sexuality refers to a person's capacity for sexual feelings.
Sociological issues concerning sexuality include general attitudes towards sexual diversity, the legalization of same-sex marriage, sexual difference as a source of inequality, and many more.
Our sexual orientation is natural, and something that cannot be changed by external or socio-cultural forces. However, our general attitudes towards sex and sexuality are highly influenced by the processes of socialization which we experience, with agents such as the family, religion, the workplace, education, the media and religion.
What is the difference between 'sex' and 'gender'?
Sex refers to the biological and/or physiological characteristics that distinguish 'males' from 'females'. On the other hand, gender refers to the social, cultural and personal expressions that society has historically assigned as being typically 'masculine' or 'feminine'.
Expressions of gender differ between cultures and overtime. What does this tell us about gender?
This tells us that gender is a social construction.
What is 'sexuality'?
Sexuality refers to a person's capacity for sexual feelings.
The terms 'sexuality' and 'sexual orientation' can be used interchangeably. True or false?
False! While sexuality refers to a person's capacity for sexual feelings, sexual orientation references the gender(s) to which someone is sexually attracted (such as homosexual or bisexual).
What does the sociological study of sex and sexuality focus on?
In sociology, the study of sex and sexuality focuses on sexual attitudes and practices, as opposed to the physiological or biological understandings of these concepts.
How are dominant ideas about gender, sex and sexuality normalized and perpetuated within societies?
Through primary and secondary socialization, whereby people learn and adopt a society's key norms and values through agents such as their family, education, workplace, religion and the media.
Already have an account? Log in
Open in AppThe first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of Vaia.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Already have an account? Log in