Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
|
|
Scientific Research

Researchers cannot make wild theories such as a link between taking a vaccine and becoming happier. If they want this to be accepted by the scientific community, scientific research evidence is needed. And still, we can only assume it is the current temporary truth. So, really in psychology, there is no end-game. Thus, scientific research aims to prove or disprove…

Content verified by subject matter experts
Free StudySmarter App with over 20 million students
Mockup Schule

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

Scientific Research

Scientific Research

Save the explanation now and read when you’ve got time to spare.

Save
Illustration

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
Illustration

Researchers cannot make wild theories such as a link between taking a vaccine and becoming happier. If they want this to be accepted by the scientific community, scientific research evidence is needed. And still, we can only assume it is the current temporary truth. So, really in psychology, there is no end-game. Thus, scientific research aims to prove or disprove existing theories.

  • We will kick off our learning by understanding the concepts of the scientific method of research, including the aims of scientific research.
  • Then, we will explore the steps of scientific research generally taken in psychology.
  • And finally, we will look at the types of scientific research and some scientific research examples.

Scientific Method of Research

Scientific research follows a systematic approach. It aims to acquire new information that adds to the existing knowledge in the research field. The consensus of scientific research is that researchers should plan their investigation before executing it.

This is important as it can help identify if research is observable, empirical, objective, valid, and reliable. These are the key features of scientific research.

But how can we tell if research is scientific?

Similar to how products are quality assessed before they reach customers, research is assessed using quality criteria. The quality criteria standards of qualitative and quantitative research differ.

For example, validity, reliability, empiricalness and objectivity are essential in quantitative research. On the other hand, transferability, credibility and confirmability are essential in qualitative research.

The two types of research have different quality criteria because of their different natures. Quantitative research focuses on the facts. But, qualitative research focuses on participants' subjective experiences.

Scientific Research, Researcher holding a conical flask containing foreign substance, VaiaFigure 1. Experimental research conducted in a lab setting is considered scientific research.

Aims of Scientific Research

Scientific research aims to identify and build scientific knowledge that discovers and explains laws or principles of natural or social phenomena. There tend to be multiple explanations proposed by various researchers to explain a phenomenon. The aim of scientific research is to either provide supporting evidence or disprove them.

The reasons why it is important for research to be scientific are:

  • It leads to the progression of our understanding of a phenomenon. Based on these findings, researchers can outline the motivations/drives concerning individuals' thoughts and behaviours. They can also discover how illnesses occur and progress or how to treat them.
  • Since research is used, for example, to test the effectiveness of a treatment, it is crucial to ensure that it is based on scientific and empirical data. This ensures that people get the correct treatment to improve their condition.
  • Scientific research ensures that the findings collected are reliable and valid. Reliability and validity are essential because they guarantee that the results apply to the target population and that the investigation measures what it intends.

This process is what causes the progression of knowledge in the scientific fields.

Steps of Scientific Research

For research to be scientific, it should follow a specific process. Following this process ensures that the investigation is empirical and observable. It also increases the likelihood of the researcher measuring variables in a reliable, valid, and objective manner.

The seven stages that research should follow to be scientific are:

  • Make an observation: observe an interesting phenomenon.
  • Ask a question: based on the observation, form a research question.
  • Form a hypothesis: after formulating the research question, the researcher should identify and operationalise the tested variables. These variables form a hypothesis: a testable statement concerning how the research will investigate the research question.

Popper argued that hypotheses should be falsifiable, meaning they should be written in a testable way and can be proven wrong. If researchers predict unicorns make children happier, this is not falsifiable as this can't be empirically investigated.

  • Make a prediction based on the hypothesis: researchers should conduct background research before conducting research and make a guess/prediction of what they expect to happen when testing the hypothesis.
  • Test the hypothesis: carry out empirical research to test the hypothesis.
  • Analyse the data: the researcher should analyse the gathered data to identify if it supports or rejects the hypothesis proposed.
  • Conclusions: the researcher should state whether the hypothesis was accepted or rejected, provide general feedback on their research (strengths/weaknesses), and acknowledge how the results will be used to make new hypotheses. This will indicate the next direction that research should take to add to the psychology research field.

Once research has been conducted, a scientific report should be written. A scientific research report should include an introduction, procedure, results, discussion and references. These sections must be written according to the American Psychological Association guidelines.

Types of Scientific Research

Psychology is often regarded as a fragmented subject. In biology, a natural science, usually one method, experimentation, is used to prove or disprove a theory, but this is not the case in psychology.

There are various approaches in psychology, each of which has a preference and disregards specific assumptions and research methods.

Biological psychologists have a preference towards experimental methods and disregard principles of the role of nurture.

The approaches in psychology are described as paradigms by Kuhn. He argued that the popular and accepted paradigm is based on which approach is best and most suited to explain the current theories.

When an approach can no longer explain the current phenomenon, there is a paradigm shift, and a more suited approach becomes accepted.

Scientific research can be classified based on different categorising systems. For example, whether the study uses primary or secondary data, what type of causality relationship the data provides, or the research setting. This next section will explain the different types of scientific research used in psychology.

The three main ways of categorising research are to identify the purpose of the research:

  • Exploratory research aims to investigate new phenomena that have not been previously investigated or have limited research. It tends to be used as an initial stage to identify potential variables to understand a phenomenon.
  • Descriptive research examines questions regarding the whats, whens, and where of phenomena. For example, to describe how variables are related to a phenomenon.
  • Analytical research provides explanatory findings of phenomena. It finds and explains causal relationships between variables.

Scientific Research: Causality

Descriptive research allows researchers to identify similarities or differences and describe the data. This type of research can describe the research findings but cannot be used to explain why the results occurred.

Examples of descriptive research include:

  • Descriptive statistics include the mean, median, mode, range, and standard deviation.
  • A case report is a study that investigates a phenomenon of a unique characteristic observed in an individual.
  • Epidemiological research explores the prevalence of epidemiology (diseases in the population).

What's important to note is that causality can be inferred from this type of scientific research.

Researchers use analytical research to explain why phenomena occur. They usually use a comparison group to identify differences between the experimental groups.

Researchers can infer causality from experimental, analytical research. This is because of its scientific nature, as the researcher experiments in a controlled setting. Scientific research involves manipulating an independent variable and measuring its effect on the dependent variable whilst controlling external factors.

As external influences are controlled, researchers can say with confidence (but not 100%) that the observed results are due to the manipulation of the independent variable.

In scientific research, the independent variable is thought of as the phenomenon's cause, and the dependent variable is theorised as the effect.

Scientific Research Examples

Research can be identified as primary or secondary research. This can be determined by whether the data used for analysis is collected themself or if they use previously published findings.

Primary research is data collected and analysed by themselves.

Some examples of primary scientific research are:

  • Laboratory experiments - research carried out in a controlled environment.
  • Field research - research carried out in a real-life setting. Here the researcher manipulates the independent variable.
  • Natural experiments - research conducted in a real-life setting with no intervention from the researcher.

Although these examples are all regarded as scientific research, laboratory experiments are considered the most scientific and natural experiments the least. As in lab experiments, the researchers have the most control, and natural experiments have the least.

Now secondary research is the opposite of primary; it involves using previously published research or data to support or negate a hypothesis.

Some examples of secondary scientific research are:

  • A meta-analysis - uses statistical means to combine and analyse data from multiple studies that are similar.
  • A systematic review uses a systematic approach (clearly defining variables and creating extensive inclusion and exclusion criteria to find research in databases) to gather empirical data and answer a research question.
  • A review is when the researcher critiques another researcher's published work.

Similarly, these are considered scientific; however, many critiques of these research methods concern the researchers limited control and how this can later affect the study's reliability and validity.

Scientific Research - Key takeaways

  • The scientific method of research suggests that research should checkmark the following criteria: empirical, objective, reliable and valid.
  • The aims of scientific research are to build scientific knowledge that discovers and explains laws or principles of natural or social phenomena.
  • In general, there are seven steps of scientific research.

  • Primary scientific research examples include lab, field and natural experiments and secondary scientific research examples include meta-analyses, systematic reviews and reviews.

  • Laboratory experiments are considered the most 'scientific' type of scientific research.


Frequently Asked Questions about Scientific Research

In general, there are seven steps of scientific research. These aim to ensure that scientific research is reliable, valid, objective and empirical. 

Research is a data collection and analysis method used to add to our existing knowledge. But the difference is that scientific research follows a systematic approach to acquiring new information that adds to the current knowledge in the research field. This research is required to be observable, objective and empirical. 

Primary scientific research examples include lab, field and natural experiments; secondary scientific research examples include meta-analyses, systematic reviews and reviews. 

  1. Make an observation.
  2. Ask a question.
  3. Form a hypothesis.
  4. Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
  5. Test the hypothesis.
  6. Analyse the data.
  7. Drawing conclusions.

Scientific research is defined as research that follows a systematic approach to acquiring new information that adds to the existing knowledge in the research field. 

Research must be scientific because it leads to the progression of our understanding of phenomena. 

Final Scientific Research Quiz

Scientific Research Quiz - Teste dein Wissen

Question

What theory did Kuhn propose?

Show answer

Answer

Theory of paradigms.

Show question

Question

What are paradigms?


Show answer

Answer

Paradigms are a group of theories or perspectives used to explain a specific subject. Essentially, paradigms are a way of looking at something.

Show question

Question

What theory did Karl Popper propose?

Show answer

Answer

Theory of falsifiability.

Show question

Question

What is the theory of falsifiability? 

Show answer

Answer

The theory of falsifiability is a theory that proposes theories/hypotheses that should be testable and able to be proven wrong. For instance, they should be observable and able to be tested via observational methods.

Show question

Question

What are the principles of falsifiability? 


Show answer

Answer

  • For research to be regarded as scientific, it needs to be observable, and hypotheses must be able to be proven wrong. 
  • The world is ‘theory-laden’, and we use these theories to understand and explain our observations.
  • Research should take a deductive approach using deductive logic; the researchers’ role is to support or reject theories. 
  • If a falsifiable theory is tested and yields significant results, it is accepted as scientific evidence. The current paradigm can largely impact if a theory is accepted as scientific evidence. 

Show question

Question

Of the following example statements, which would be regarded as non-falsifiable?  

Show answer

Answer

Unicorns are magical creatures.

Show question

Question

Of the following example statements, which would be regarded as falsifiable?  

Show answer

Answer

People who have attained self-actualisation are less likely to be depressed than those who have not reached self-actualisation. 

Show question

Question

State the example Popper gave of why scientific research should take a deductive approach to research. 

Show answer

Answer

Based on observations and using inductive reasoning, Europeans thought that there were only white swans. However, after exploring Australia, Europeans observed black swans and so deduced that not all swans are white.

Show question

Question

What is a strength of the theory of falsifiability?


Show answer

Answer

The theory is realistic as it proposes that hypotheses cannot be 100% proven.

Show question

Question

What is a weakness of the theory of falsifiability? 

Show answer

Answer

It is difficult to know when to draw the line. For instance, how many observations are required to disprove a theory?  

Show question

Question

What is a scientific report?

Show answer

Answer

A scientific report consists of details regarding scientists reporting what their research entailed and reporting the results and conclusions drawn from the study.

Show question

Question

Why is scientific research reported per APA in psychology?

Show answer

Answer

  • It ensures the scientists report enough information.
  • It makes the report easier to read and find relevant information.
  • It ensures the original research authors are acknowledged and credited.

Show question

Question

How should the following book be reported per APA guidelines? The book is called Abnormal psychology, Worth Publishers published it in New York in 2007. Ronald J Comer wrote the book. 

Show answer

Answer

Comer, R. J. (2007). Abnormal psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.

Show question

Question

What structure should a scientific report follow?

Show answer

Answer

The structure of a scientific report should use the following subheadings: 

  • Abstract.
  • Introduction.
  • Method.
  • Results.
  • Discussion.
  • References.
  • Occasionally appendix.

Show question

Question

What are potential subheadings we can find in the methods section of a scientific report? 


Show answer

Answer

  • Design.
  • Participants.
  • Materials.
  • Procedure.
  • Ethics.

Show question

Question

Where can readers find the hypothesis of research? 

Show answer

Answer

In the abstract and introduction.

Show question

Question

What is the purpose of the abstract?

Show answer

Answer

The purpose of the abstract is to provide an overview of the research so that the reader can quickly identify if the research is relevant or of interest to them.

Show question

Question

How long should an abstract be?

Show answer

Answer

250-300 words.

Show question

Question

Is the following reference reported in accordance with APA guidelines ‘Fjell, A. M., Walhovd, K. B., Fischl, B., & Reinvang, I. Cognitive function, P3a/P3b brain potentials, and cortical thickness in ageing. Human Brain Mapping, 28 (11), 1098-1116. doi:10.1002/hbm.20335’?

Show answer

Answer

No, the publication year is missing.

Show question

Question

Do researchers have to report insignificant data?

Show answer

Answer

Yes, they need to report all data, whether significant or not.

Show question

Question

What is the difference between the information that should be put in the results and discussion section?

Show answer

Answer

In the results section, the researcher should insert the inferential data analysed, which could take the form of numerical numbers, graphs and figures. In this section, they should not discuss or explain the results. Instead, they should write it under the discussion heading. However, the data reported in the results section should not be repeated here.

Show question

Question

What is a primary scientific report?

Show answer

Answer

A primary scientific report is produced when the researchers conduct the research themselves.

Show question

Question

What is a secondary scientific report?

Show answer

Answer

Secondary scientific reports such as peer-reviews, meta-analysis and systematic reviews are a type of scientific report that scientists produce when the researcher answers their proposed research question using previously published findings.

Show question

Question

What kind of details should be added in the discussion section?

Show answer

Answer

  • The first thing that researchers should write about in the discussion is whether the findings support the hypothesis proposed or not.
  • They should then discuss and explain the results the research found.
  • They should then compare the findings to previously published findings that investigated the phenomena.
  • It is essential to critique this research, such as the strengths and weaknesses, how it contributed to the psychology field and its next direction.

Show question

Question

What information should be provided in the procedure section of a scientific report?

Show answer

Answer

  • This section should describe what researchers did in the research in the order they conducted it.
  • They should include the details about standardised instruction, informed consent, and debriefing.

Show question

Question

What is scientific research?

Show answer

Answer

Scientific research follows a systematic approach in order to acquire new information that adds to the existing knowledge in the research field.

Show question

Question

What causes the progression of our knowledge in the scientific field? 


Show answer

Answer

There tend to be multiple explanations when building theories to explain a phenomenon. With scientific research, we can identify studies that provide better explanations and disregard disproved explanations. This process is what causes the progression of knowledge in the scientific fields.

Show question

Question

What does Kuhn call the approaches in psychology? 

Show answer

Answer

Paradigms.

Show question

Question

How do we establish if research is scientific?


Show answer

Answer

Using a quality criteria checklist, if it ticks all the boxes, it can be regarded as scientific. 

Show question

Question

Why does research need to be based on scientific and empirical data? 


Show answer

Answer

Due to its utility. Since it can test the effectiveness of treatment, it is important to ensure that the research is based on scientific and empirical data. That way, it ensures that people get the correct treatment to improve their condition.

Show question

Question

What are the seven stages of the scientific research process? 


Show answer

Answer

  1. Make an observation.
  2. Ask a question.
  3. Form a hypothesis.
  4. Make a prediction based on the hypothesis.
  5. Test the hypothesis.
  6. Analyse the data.
  7. Draw a conclusion.


Show question

Question

What are the three main ways that scientific research is categorised?


Show answer

Answer

  • Explorative 
  • Descriptive 
  • Analytical


Show question

Question

What is primary research? 



Show answer

Answer

Primary research is research that the investigator conducts.


Show question

Question

What is secondary research? 

Show answer

Answer

Secondary research is research using and analysing previously published studies to understand phenomena.

Show question

Question

What is the difference between scientific research and research? 


Show answer

Answer

Research is a data collection and analysis method used to add to our existing knowledge. But the difference is that scientific research follows a systematic approach to acquiring new information that adds to the current knowledge in the research field. This research is required to be observable, objective and empirical. 


Show question

Question

What information can descriptive research not provide? 


Show answer

Answer

Descriptive research cannot explain why a phenomenon occurs. i.e., provide causality explanations.

Show question

Question

Why is a systematic review classified as secondary research? 


Show answer

Answer

Because it uses methods that don't involve the researcher collecting data themselves, i.e. previous findings are used. 

Show question

Question

What is the definition of research quality criteria?

Show answer

Answer

Research quality criteria are requirements for research that psychologists have agreed upon and recommended. 

Show question

Question

What are the research quality criteria for quantitative data?

Show answer

Answer

  • Validity.
  • Reliability. 
  • Objectivity. 
  • Empirical research.

Show question

Question

What is the definition of standardising variables and how is it used to measure internal validity?

Show answer

Answer

Standardised variables refer to providing a definition of the variable and providing details of how the research is measuring the variable. This allows the researcher and the readers to identify and provide instructions on what the variables are, how they are measured and analysed. They can use statistical analyses to identify if variables are assessing what they are intended to measure (internal validity).

Show question

Question

How can researchers check the reliability of quantitative data? 


Show answer

Answer

  • Checking the internal reliability/ consistency of scales - for instance, all of the questions in a scale that measures depression should be measuring depression levels.
  • Assessing the generalisability theory - identifying the consistency of instruments used in research or if results obtained from participants are due to specific conditions   


Show question

Question

What are the research quality criteria for qualitative data? 

Show answer

Answer

  • Credibility.
  • Transferability.
  • Dependability.
  • Confirmability.

Show question

Question

How can researchers ensure that qualitative research produced is transferable?

Show answer

Answer

  • Taking detailed notes on what was observed during the research.
  • When describing participant behaviours and experiences, also make notes on context so that other researchers can understand and interpret the researcher’s perspective.

Show question

Question

What is the definition of triangulation, and how does it ensure that research is credible?

Show answer

Answer

Triangulation refers to researchers using multiple data collection methods to confirm hypotheses. Triangulation ensures research is credible as using various data collection methods will provide data from various settings and contexts. This allows a generalised, observable overview of the phenomenon the researcher is interested in.

Show question

Question

What is credibility?

Show answer

Answer

Credibility refers to whether research findings are believable based on data collected from participants.

Show question

Question

Which two research quality criteria use audit trails to ensure the criterion assumption is met? 

Show answer

Answer

Dependability and confirmability.

Show question

Question

What is the definition of empirical research?

Show answer

Answer

Empirical research is based on direct observations rather than subjective opinions, data and analysis techniques.

Show question

Question

What type of data can be considered empirical?

Show answer

Answer

Both qualitative and quantitative data can be empirical.

Show question

Question

What are the key characteristics of empirical research?

Show answer

Answer

  • This framework follows the stages of the scientific method and provides step-by-step guidance on how scientific research should be conducted.
  • Data should be observable.
  • Data should be verifiable.


Show question

Question

How does the scientific method ensure objective data is drawn?

Show answer

Answer

The scientific method provides an empirical technique for researchers to follow, limiting biases affecting data thus, increasing validity. Therefore, statistical inferences are deduced from data-driven, empirical evidence.

Show question

More about Scientific Research
60%

of the users don't pass the Scientific Research quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

Free psychology cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Access cheat sheet

Discover the right content for your subjects

No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!

Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.

Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time.

Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.

Study Sets

Have all your study materials in one place.

Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online.

Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses.

Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.

Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.

Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.

Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.

Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Start learning with StudySmarter, the only learning app you need.

Sign up now for free
Illustration