Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
|
|
Scientific Processes

If we say something is scientific, it doesn't actually make it scientific. The same can be said about psychology. Scientific processes have been established to ensure that research meets the expected standard.We will start by covering the scientific method: psychology. Then, we will delve into the scientific method steps. Moving on, we will explore the scientific method in research. Next, we will look…

Content verified by subject matter experts
Free StudySmarter App with over 20 million students
Mockup Schule

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

Scientific Processes

Scientific Processes

Save the explanation now and read when you’ve got time to spare.

Save
Illustration

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
Illustration

If we say something is scientific, it doesn't actually make it scientific. The same can be said about psychology. Scientific processes have been established to ensure that research meets the expected standard.

  • We will start by covering the scientific method: psychology.
  • Then, we will delve into the scientific method steps.
  • Moving on, we will explore the scientific method in research.
  • Next, we will look at some scientific investigation examples commonly used in psychology.
  • Finally, we will explore the scientific method experiments.

Scientific Method Psychology

The scientific process is an empirical method developed by Sir Francis Bacon, providing a framework for researchers to follow.

Empirical research is thus enabled, and biases that affect the interpretation of results are limited. We conduct empirical research by empirically testing falsifiable hypotheses and determining whether these predictions are consistent with previous empirical observations.

The term 'empirical' refers to a phenomenon or data that has been observed and measured in a carefully controlled manner (scientifically).

There are different requirements of scientific research:

  • When conducting research with a scientific background, we must use vigorous, empirical methods through controlled experiments to arrive at results that we can apply to real-life settings, such as treating disease.

  • Reliability – the procedure description should be detailed and easy for other researchers to replicate. Researchers can then examine its reliability and determine the generalisability of results; this is the case when similar findings are found.

  • Validity – the scientific process provides researchers with an empirical technique that limits data bias, thus increasing validity.

There are different paradigms/schools of thought in psychology; essentially, these are the approaches of psychology.

Each approach explains human behaviour causes differently and has different preferences towards research methods.

Scientific Processes, Hand holding conical flask in a lab setting, VaiaFig. 1. Scientific research should be empirical, reliable and valid.

Scientific Method Steps

The scientific process involves formulating hypotheses using inductive methods (e.g., collecting observations of natural phenomena) to develop a theory or research question.

We then make deductions from hypotheses based on the results of the experiment. We adjust or eliminate the hypotheses depending on whether the conclusions drawn are supportive or contradictory. Thus, the scientific process is also called a hypothetico-deductive model.

Scientific Method Steps Description
Observations and research questionsInitially, researchers observe natural phenomena. Researchers formulate research questions based on these observations to understand the research area better.
Formulating hypotheses Based on the research questions, researchers need to formulate hypotheses.Hypotheses need to be predictive and falsifiable statements. They can be supported or negated via observations or experimental methods.
Testing hypothesis Researchers must design and conduct experiments or observations that test the hypothesis.Experiment study designs must be verifiable, i.e. allow other researchers to replicate them. Such experiments guarantee the reliability of the results. For this, a detailed description of the procedural techniques is required.
Analysing dataThe researcher carries out statistical tests to confirm or refute hypotheses. For quantifiable data, if the analysis is statistically significant data following the direction of the hypothesis, supportive evidence of the thesis is implied. And if insignificant findings and the results opposite of the hypothesis are found, the alternative hypothesis is rejected.Another critical factor is that all data must be reported according to APA guidelines, whether they support or reject the hypothesis.
Drawing conclusions This stage involves drawing conclusions based on the data obtained and comparing it to previous literature. Previous findings that support or contradict the current research evidence summarise the research area. This section should answer the initial research question. If contradictory results appear, the researcher should refine and re-test the hypothesis following the stages of the scientific process.

The scientific method steps follow a cycle. Once the conclusions are drawn, the researcher builds on what they have learned and follows the same steps to conduct their subsequent research.

When writing-up research, a scientific report must follow specific guidelines by the APA (American Psychological Association). Before it is accepted, the study and the report must be peer-reviewed.

Peer review is when established psychological researchers verify whether research should be accepted and published in a journal based on whether it meets the scientific research requirements.

For instance, empiricism, validity and reliability for quantitative research. Or transferability, credibility and confirmability for qualitative research).

Scientific Method in Research

Hypotheses are predictive statements composed of research findings that set expectations for the experiment. We usually deduce hypotheses from background research.

Hypotheses differ from aims in that they give a broad sense of the purpose of research.

There are different types of hypotheses in scientific research.

Types of Alternative HypothesisDefinition and Example
Directional Hypothesis The researcher states what direction the results are expected to go, e.g. students who revised more will score higher in exams (%) than those who revised less.
Non-directional HypothesisThe researcher states there will be a difference but doesn't state the direction of the expected results, e.g. students who used revision guide A will differ from exam scores (%) of students who used revision guide B.

And a null hypothesis is when the researcher expects to find no difference between variables.

In scientific research, hypotheses must identify variables and operationalise these.

The two types of variables investigated in scientific research are independent variables (what the researcher manipulates and is theorised as the cause of a phenomenon) and dependent variables (what the researcher measures, theorised as the effect of a phenomenon).

Operationalised variables mean that the researcher should state the variable's unit of measurement and how these will be measured, e.g. if they use an established questionnaire or inventory.

Scientific Investigation Examples

There are scientific investigations; let's take a look at a few.

Types of Scientific InvestigationsDescription
Pilot studiesThese are preliminary research used to test out research before a full-blown experiment is conducted. The aim of pilot studies is to test and adapt research so that the research is in its best shape when conducted. A pilot study must be conducted when using new measures.For example, constructing questionnaires, e.g. creating new ones, must be piloted before being used in an experiment.
ExperimentsExperiments are research conducted in controlled environments and involve manipulating and measuring variables of interest. Only from controlled, empirical, objective, valid and reliable experimental research can psychology researchers make causation inferences.
Observational design The experiment involves watching (overt or covert) participants in different environments (controlled or naturalistic) participants and recording their behaviour to identify if the findings support or negate the proposed hypothesis.
Self-report design This is when measures such as some types of interviews, psychometric tests or questionnaires are sent to respondents, i.e. a measure that involves respondents giving information without researcher interference.

Scientific Method Experiments

Let's move our focus to scientific methods in experiments. There are several types of experiments used in psychology.

When conducting scientific method experiments, researchers must consider sampling techniques, experimental designs, and ethical issues when designing experimental research.

Experimental designs are how participants are divided into conditions/groups to manipulate the different independent variable levels (e.g. experimental and control groups).

And the sampling techniques are various methods used to allocate participants to the different experimental conditions.

The three experimental groups design used in psychology are:

  • Independent Group Design (IGD) - Participants participate in one condition, e.g. one group receives CBT, and the other group receives medication.
  • Repeated-Measures Design (RMD) - The same participants partake in each condition, e.g. researchers measure depression scores before and after an intervention.
  • Matched Pairs Design (MPD) - Participants are matched based on key characteristics of interest, e.g. age or height. One of each pair will be assigned to the experimental group and the other to the control group.

Several sampling techniques, e.g. volunteer, opportunity, random, snowball, systematic, etc., can be used in psychological research.

Random sampling is considered the optimum sampling technique as it involves the least researcher involvement, so it is the least likely to be influenced by subjectivity and researcher bias. Researcher bias reduces the study's validity

The five main ethical issues in psychological research are as follows:

  1. Informed consent.
  2. Confidentiality.
  3. Prevent psychological/ physical harm.
  4. Deception.
  5. Rights to withdraw.

Scientific Processes - Key takeaways

  • The scientific method: psychology suggests research should be empirical, reliable and valid.
  • There are five scientific method steps: making observations and research questions, formulating hypotheses, testing the hypothesis, analysing the data and drawing conclusions from the data.
  • The scientific method in research should identify aims and hypotheses, including operationalised variables.
  • Some scientific investigation examples are pilot studies, experiments, observational designs and self-report techniques, to name a few.
  • When conducting scientific method experiments, researchers must consider sampling techniques, experimental designs, and ethical issues when designing experimental research.

Frequently Asked Questions about Scientific Processes

Scientific processes are an empirical method created by Sir Francis Bacon, providing a framework for researchers to follow when creating research.

This explains the scientific process, using an example of students and their grades. 

  • Observation and research question - some students performed better than others. The research question would be. Why do some students perform better than others?
  • Formulating hypothesis- based upon previous literature, it can be predicted that students who studied for longer periods attained higher grades.
  • Testing hypothesis questionnaires and reports that identify how long students studied and grades received
  • Analysing- correlational analysis between the two variables
  • Conclusions- significant positive correlation between time spent studying and grades supports the hypothesis, which has also been found in previous studies.

The scientific method: psychology is the 'golden standard' framework of how research should be carried out. This is because the process provides an empirical, standardised method for creating research, which increases the reliability and validity of findings.

The scientific method in research tests whether data is scientific-driven and whether it supports or rejects the hypotheses proposed in the study.

The correct order of the scientific process is as follows: observing a naturally occurring phenomenon and formulating research questions and hypotheses, testing the hypotheses empirically, analysing data and then drawing conclusions from the data found. The stages repeat in a cycle.

Final Scientific Processes Quiz

Scientific Processes Quiz - Teste dein Wissen

Question

What is an experimental design?

Show answer

Answer

Experimental design refers to how participants are assigned to the different conditions of an experiment. 

Show question

Question

What are four examples of experimental designs?

Show answer

Answer

The four experimental designs are independent measures, repeated measures, matched pairs and quasi-experimental designs.

Show question

Question

What is an independent measures design?

Show answer

Answer

Independent measures design involves assigning participants to only one of your experimental conditions. 

Show question

Question

What is a repeated measures design?

Show answer

Answer

Repeated measures design involves subjecting the same group of participants to all independent variable levels.

Show question

Question

What is a matched-pairs design? 

Show answer

Answer

Matched-pairs design involves pairing participants based on specific characteristics that could be potential confounding variables. 

Show question

Question

What is a quasi-experimental design?

Show answer

Answer

The quasi-experimental design tests different participants at each level of the independent variable. It utilises naturally existing groups and investigates differences between them.

Show question

Question

For the following research scenario, ‘an investigation to identify if Clozapine (medication) is an effective drug to minimise symptoms of schizophrenia’, which experimental design would be appropriate to use and why?

Show answer

Answer

A quasi-experimental design would be appropriate because it can compare schizophrenia patients taking Clozapine (experimental group) and patients with schizophrenia using a different drug. This allows the researcher to identify if Clozapine or another drug is better at minimising symptoms of schizophrenia in the recruited sample. This design is required, as ethically, researchers cannot change patients medication because it may cause physical and/or psychological harm to participants.

Show question

Question

How do independent group designs and quasi-experimental designs differ?

Show answer

Answer

They differ in terms of method of allocation. Independent group designs can allocate participants into groups (e.g. by using random allocation), but quasi-experimental designs can't allocate participants into groups, instead they use already existing groups.

Show question

Question

What is the advantage of using a repeated measure design over an independent experimental design?

Show answer

Answer

An advantage of using a repeated measures design instead of an independent design is that it controls for individual differences. 

Show question

Question

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using a matched-pairs experimental design?

Show answer

Answer

The advantage of using a matched-pairs design is that it accounts for individual differences and is not affected by order effects. The disadvantages are that it is challenging to match participants, and recruiting participants can be costly and time-consuming.

Show question

Question

What is the purpose of counterbalancing?

Show answer

Answer

To minimise order effects in repeated measures designs.

Show question

Question

What does counterbalancing involve?

Show answer

Answer

Counterbalancing involves subjecting half of the participants to the first condition first and the other half to the second condition first. 

Show question

Question

According to the scientific process, what should a hypothesis be?

Show answer

Answer

Hypotheses are predictive, falsifiable, and verifiable statements that identify operationalised variables.


Show question

Question

Why is the scientific process also called the hypothetico-deductive model?

Show answer

Answer

The scientific process involves the following stages for empirical research: forming a hypothesis, using inductive methods and deducing supporting or negating evidence using experimental techniques.

Show question

Question

What inductive method do we use to form research questions?

Show answer

Answer

The accumulation of observations of natural phenomena to comprise a theory/principle.

Show question

Question

Write a directional hypothesis based upon the research question 'Does sleep affect memory performance?'.


Show answer

Answer

The 'sleep-deprived' individuals will have lower memory scores than those with 'normal sleep'.

Show question

Question

Describe a method that will provide empirical data that tests whether sleep affects performance in memory tasks.

Show answer

Answer

The study could randomly assign participants to the 'sleep-deprived' and the 'regular sleep' groups. The two groups could then carry out a memory task and the study would then analyse and compare the scores. 

Show question

Question

What should be done if data negates the hypothesis proposed?

Show answer

Answer

The researcher should report the data following APA guidelines, revise the hypothesis, and repeat the scientific method.

Show question

Question

Why do we need the scientific process?

Show answer

Answer

The process provides an empirical, standardised method for producing research that increases the reliability and validity of the results.

Show question

Question

What is an independent variable?

Show answer

Answer

The independent variable (IV) is a factor that the experimenter manipulates to see if it affects the dependent variable (DV). 

Show question

Question

What is a dependent variable?


Show answer

Answer

The dependent variable (DV) is the factor that is affected when the independent variable (IV) is manipulated.

Show question

Question

How can the experimental research method be used to identify causal relationships between variables? 


Show answer

Answer

Causal relationships are identified if changes in the IV have an effect on the DV. 

Show question

Question

What information does operationalisation give about variables?

Show answer

Answer

How the variable is defined and measured.

Show question

Question

Of the following examples, which one is operationalised?

Show answer

Answer

IV- amount of water (ml) given to a plant & DV- height plant grown (cm).

Show question

Question

What is a confounding variable?

Show answer

Answer

A confounding variable is a factor that has not been considered because it is associated with both IV and DV.

Show question

Question

What is an extraneous variable?

Show answer

Answer

Extraneous variables are factors that are not the IV but may influence the results (DV).

Show question

Question

What is a continuous variable?

Show answer

Answer

A continuous variable is a variable that can potentially have an unlimited number of possible values and is usually determined by measuring or counting a variable.

Show question

Question

What is a control variable?

Show answer

Answer

Other factors/variables excluding the IV that affect the DV (potential confounding/ extraneous variables).

Show question

Question

What control variables should researchers consider for the following research scenario, research investigating whether caffeine influences participants' ability to recall memories?

Show answer

Answer

Age and noise level.

Show question

Question

How do confounding and extraneous variables differ?

Show answer

Answer

Extraneous variables compete alongside the IV to explain the results observed in research, whereas confounding variables cause issues in the study as it is related to both the IV and DV.

Show question

Question

Give an example of a continuous variable.

Show answer

Answer

Age.

Show question

Question

Why is the operationalisation of variables important?

Show answer

Answer

Operationalisation is important for a few reasons. Some of these are - 

  • Clearly defining variables and how they are measured in research makes it easier for researchers to replicate the study and determine the reliability of the results.
  • It is easier to ensure that the studied variables have high internal validity, i.e., they measure what they are supposed to measure).
  • Reduces the likelihood that subjectivity will influence the research.
  • Ensures that the variables being studied are observable and measurable.

Show question

Question

What is an operationalised variable? 


Show answer

Answer

Operationalisation of variables means that the variables under study are clearly defined with information about how the study will measure them.

Show question

Question

For the following research scenario, ‘an investigation to uncover whether problem-solving skills are affected by emotion’ states how the researchers could operationalise the investigated variables.

Show answer

Answer

The researchers would identify emotion as the IV and problem-solving skills as the DV. The researcher would then place the operationalised definition of the IV as ‘emotional intelligence measured and scored by the Emotional Intelligence Test. Furthermore, the operationalised definition of the DV would be ‘time required to solve a problem-solving test, for instance, a Sudoku puzzle.

Show question

Question

Give an example of a confounding variable.

Show answer

Answer

In a study to see if exercise impacts an individual's body mass index (BMI), for the IV, researchers might divide the participants into two groups: the exercise group and the non-exercise group, and DV as changes in body mass index (BMI). 

However, dietary change is a factor that affects weight changes too. If the research design does not account for dietary changes, this may distort the observed results of how much IV affects DV. Therefore, it is a confounding variable.

Show question

Question

What theory did Kuhn propose?

Show answer

Answer

Theory of paradigms.

Show question

Question

What are paradigms?


Show answer

Answer

Paradigms are a group of theories or perspectives used to explain a specific subject. Essentially, paradigms are a way of looking at something.

Show question

Question

What theory did Karl Popper propose?

Show answer

Answer

Theory of falsifiability.

Show question

Question

What is the theory of falsifiability? 

Show answer

Answer

The theory of falsifiability is a theory that proposes theories/hypotheses that should be testable and able to be proven wrong. For instance, they should be observable and able to be tested via observational methods.

Show question

Question

What are the principles of falsifiability? 


Show answer

Answer

  • For research to be regarded as scientific, it needs to be observable, and hypotheses must be able to be proven wrong. 
  • The world is ‘theory-laden’, and we use these theories to understand and explain our observations.
  • Research should take a deductive approach using deductive logic; the researchers’ role is to support or reject theories. 
  • If a falsifiable theory is tested and yields significant results, it is accepted as scientific evidence. The current paradigm can largely impact if a theory is accepted as scientific evidence. 

Show question

Question

Of the following example statements, which would be regarded as non-falsifiable?  

Show answer

Answer

Unicorns are magical creatures.

Show question

Question

Of the following example statements, which would be regarded as falsifiable?  

Show answer

Answer

People who have attained self-actualisation are less likely to be depressed than those who have not reached self-actualisation. 

Show question

Question

State the example Popper gave of why scientific research should take a deductive approach to research. 

Show answer

Answer

Based on observations and using inductive reasoning, Europeans thought that there were only white swans. However, after exploring Australia, Europeans observed black swans and so deduced that not all swans are white.

Show question

Question

What is a strength of the theory of falsifiability?


Show answer

Answer

The theory is realistic as it proposes that hypotheses cannot be 100% proven.

Show question

Question

What is a weakness of the theory of falsifiability? 

Show answer

Answer

It is difficult to know when to draw the line. For instance, how many observations are required to disprove a theory?  

Show question

Question

What is a scientific report?

Show answer

Answer

A scientific report consists of details regarding scientists reporting what their research entailed and reporting the results and conclusions drawn from the study.

Show question

Question

Why is scientific research reported per APA in psychology?

Show answer

Answer

  • It ensures the scientists report enough information.
  • It makes the report easier to read and find relevant information.
  • It ensures the original research authors are acknowledged and credited.

Show question

Question

How should the following book be reported per APA guidelines? The book is called Abnormal psychology, Worth Publishers published it in New York in 2007. Ronald J Comer wrote the book. 

Show answer

Answer

Comer, R. J. (2007). Abnormal psychology. New York: Worth Publishers.

Show question

Question

What structure should a scientific report follow?

Show answer

Answer

The structure of a scientific report should use the following subheadings: 

  • Abstract.
  • Introduction.
  • Method.
  • Results.
  • Discussion.
  • References.
  • Occasionally appendix.

Show question

Question

What are potential subheadings we can find in the methods section of a scientific report? 


Show answer

Answer

  • Design.
  • Participants.
  • Materials.
  • Procedure.
  • Ethics.

Show question

60%

of the users don't pass the Scientific Processes quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

Free psychology cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Access cheat sheet

Discover the right content for your subjects

No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!

Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.

Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time.

Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.

Study Sets

Have all your study materials in one place.

Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online.

Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses.

Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.

Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.

Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.

Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.

Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Start learning with StudySmarter, the only learning app you need.

Sign up now for free
Illustration