Vaia - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
Americas
Europe
When you first meet a potential partner, there are a few things that you look at before considering the deeper aspects of a person. Physical appearance is probably the most prominent feature that people notice foremost. Whilst appearance may be the first feature people notice, other factors, such as communication cues and complementarity, may affect partner choice. What happens when the usual factors affecting partner choice are missing, however, such as in online Relationships? The absence of gating appears to affect relationships in surprising ways.
Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.
Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken
Jetzt kostenlos anmeldenWhen you first meet a potential partner, there are a few things that you look at before considering the deeper aspects of a person. Physical appearance is probably the most prominent feature that people notice foremost. Whilst appearance may be the first feature people notice, other factors, such as communication cues and complementarity, may affect partner choice. What happens when the usual factors affecting partner choice are missing, however, such as in online Relationships? The absence of gating appears to affect relationships in surprising ways.
Fig. 1 - Gating affects how much we disclose in relationships.
The absence of gating refers to how self-disclosure tends to occur at higher rates in virtual relationships due to the lack of gates that would normally affect self-disclosure rates in face-to-face relationships. Gates include appearance and social skills, which can be masked or altered by virtual environments.
Self-disclosure refers to the personal information we share with others, and it is normally affected by the level of intimacy shared between people.
Various theories explore how relationships and the types of relationships affect the degree of self-disclosure people engage in.
For example, social penetration theory suggests self-disclosure facilitates relationship development, and studies highlighted how self-disclosure happens at an increased level in virtual relationships (Joinson, 2001).
Virtual relationships in psychology refer to relationships occurring in a virtual environment, typically over computers and mobiles, for instance. With technological advancements pervading modern society, virtual relationships are more accessible than ever.
Dating sites allow people to meet people virtually before seeing them face-to-face. How can this affect the potential development of relationships?
People can now decide whether or not to pursue a relationship based on small biographies and pictures of potential partners.
People can also meet in other virtual communities, such as on gaming platforms. Long-distance relationships are more viable.
How a person sounds, acts, and smells can be an important factor in deciding whether or not someone can be a suitable partner for a romantic relationship. As we mentioned above, these factors are called gates and often act as barriers to romantic relationships.
Self-disclosure is locked behind these gates, preventing people from revealing personal information about themselves and moving relationships forward (especially if they are not interested).
In online relationships, these barriers do not exist, creating an absence of gates. The absence of gates has interesting implications for how romantic relationships progress compared to face-to-face encounters.
Diane met Craig online and shared many phone calls with him. They share an interest in video games and often spend hours playing online.
However, Diane has only heard Craig’s voice and does not know what he looks like or smells. Online relationships are ignorant of the usual social cues people face.
Diane built a romantic relationship with him by revealing a lot about herself (self-disclosure). She told her friends, and eventually, they decided to meet. When they met, Diane found that Craig was not as attractive looking as she had hoped, and she did not like how he smelled either.
Before the physical meeting, Diane was not exposed to these gates. They were absent, so she could build a relationship with Craig.
Fig. 2 - There are multiple ways to form online relationships.
Hill et al. (1976) found that 55% of those who met face to face were still together after two years, but only slightly more than half of the couples studied. Psychologists such as McKenna et al. (2002) believe that the absence of gates in online relationships leads to greater intimacy.
The ecological validity of the McKenna et al. (2002) study is quite high, but the data is based on self-report, so bias may occur (particularly social desirability bias).
However, we must remember that the absence of gates also means that people can create online personas that differ greatly from their true selves. In some cases, this can go as far as catfishing, but it could also be positive for socially anxious and shy people as they can get to know someone without the pressure of meeting in person.
Catfishing is a recent term that refers to someone creating an online persona and dating people via the internet using this persona – they often look, act, and dress differently than that persona in real life.
To understand the impact gating has on relationships and how the absence of gates affects relationship development, we need to evaluate it. Let's explore this further.
Baker and Oswald (2010) interviewed 241 participants about their social media use and shyness. The questionnaires assessed Facebook use, level of shyness, perceived social support, loneliness, and friendship quality.
They found a strong positive correlation between the level of shyness and Facebook use but no correlation between Facebook use and loneliness, suggesting that Facebook helps shy people overcome their shyness.
These days, we share a lot on social media, from videos to selfies and more. This means we can potentially see people’s characteristics that may have only been ‘gates’ noticed in face-to-face conversations in the past, such as tone of voice and facial expressions.
However, this depends on how much a person shares. Thus, the lack of gates in online relationships is a subjective factor. When someone shares more, you can see the ‘gates’ that can hinder attraction online instead of in person. Therefore, gates may not be absent in online interactions.
The definition of gates is unclear, which is a drawback when studying their influence on online relationships. Communication is also an essential factor to consider with gates because some gates are rectifiable.
Many studies on gates describe characteristics that hinder initial attraction, such as appearance, voice, and Body Language. Therefore, the impact of gates on long-term relationships is unclear. Are gates limited to initial attraction, or might we encounter gates later in relationships?
Although some see the impact of the absence of gates on self-revelation as positive, the absence of gates can also lead to deception. People may present an image/persona that is not truthful. This could be dangerous as people may fall prey to this deceptive behaviour, especially if the person brings about an intimate relationship for nefarious reasons (e.g., blackmail due to increased self-disclosure, violence, fraud, and more).
Parasocial relationships are one-sided relationships between people with one person who is unaware of the other, typically found in fans and celebrities. Fans know a lot about celebrities and seek to engage with celebrities in various forms. Celebrities, on the other hand, are unaware of the individual fan's existence.
Studies investigating parasocial relationships include:
McCutcheon (2002) developed the Celebrity Attitude Scale (CAS) to assess celebrity worship and later identified three levels of parasocial relationships.
Fig. 3 - Parasocial relationships are one-sided.
Gates are physical, non-verbal characteristics that may impede initial levels of attraction for people meeting for the first time, face-to-face, such as physical attractiveness, scent, tone of voice and body language.
Gates could stop a relationship or attraction from forming. In online relationships, psychologists such as Mckenna et al. (2002) believed that the absence of gates in online relationships leads to greater intimacy, with 71% of couples who have a relationship online staying together after two years. The absence of gating seems to improve the stability of relationships.
A virtual relationship is a relationship formed and maintained online.
Reduced cues theory is the idea that online relationships lack the physical cues we get in face-to-face interactions, such as tone of voice and body language.
It refers to the absence of barriers in romantic relationships, i.e., when we cannot see specific characteristics of a person, which might impede attraction, such as the physical appearance of someone, their body language, and scent.
Flashcards in Absence of Gating15
Start learningGive an example of a gate.
Any of the following: physical attractiveness, scent, tone of voice and body language.
Why are gates absent in online relationships?
Gates are things that hinder attraction in face-to-face encounters. While we can see some of these things online when we watch videos or video call a person, we encounter most gates in person, such as body language and tone of voice.
Mckenna et al. (2002) found that __ of online relationships lasted more than two years
71%.
Describe Baker and Oswald’s study (2010).
Baker and Oswald (2010) interviewed 241 participants about their social media use and shyness. The questionnaires assessed Facebook use, level of shyness, perceived social support, loneliness, and friendship quality. They found a strong positive correlation between the level of shyness and Facebook use but no correlation between Facebook use and loneliness, suggesting that Facebook helps shy people overcome their shyness.
Why does Buss’s 1989 study expose potential gender bias in the study of gating?
Buss found that men value good looks and younger-looking partners, while women prefer resource-based characteristics. This finding suggests women are much more dependent on ‘gates’ than men, as men’s occupations and social status are often apparent from their online profiles. In contrast, women can only be judged in person by their appearance. Therefore, the absence of gates may affect women more than men.
Why would the absence of gates in online relationships be dangerous?
Because if we do not meet someone in person, it means they can create an online persona that may not be truthful. This could be dangerous for several reasons, including blackmail, assault and more.
Already have an account? Log in
The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place
Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.
Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!
Sign up with Email Sign up with AppleBy signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of Vaia.
Already have an account? Log in