Log In Start studying!

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
StudySmarter - The all-in-one study app.
4.8 • +11k Ratings
More than 3 Million Downloads
Free
|
|
Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Are humans inherently selfish? Are we living in a dog-eat-dog world? Certainly, competition for resources and mates has been one of the driving forces in human evolution. Still, just like we're driven to compete with others for success, we also have a drive for cooperation, support, and care. Let's dive into the psychology of prosocial behaviour!We'll start by defining prosocial behaviour…

Content verified by subject matter experts
Free StudySmarter App with over 20 million students
Mockup Schule

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Save the explanation now and read when you’ve got time to spare.

Save
Illustration

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Jetzt kostenlos anmelden
Illustration

Are humans inherently selfish? Are we living in a dog-eat-dog world? Certainly, competition for resources and mates has been one of the driving forces in human evolution. Still, just like we're driven to compete with others for success, we also have a drive for cooperation, support, and care. Let's dive into the psychology of prosocial behaviour!

  • We'll start by defining prosocial behaviour in psychology and looking at some prosocial behaviour examples, as well as the difference between prosocial behaviour and altruism.
  • Is prosocial behaviour innate or learned? We'll examine the examples of prosocial behaviours in early childhood.
  • Moving on, we'll look at the factors affecting helping behaviour and how it relates to the bystander effect.
  • Finally, we'll outline the benefits of prosocial behaviour for society and the individual.

Examples of Prosocial Behaviour

Prosocial behaviour refers to actions performed to benefit others. In plain English, we usually call prosocial behaviours helping. There is a whole range of actions that fall into this category, so let's first distinguish the two main types of prosocial behaviour:

  • Mutualism or cooperation

  • Altruism

Cooperation occurs when both the actor and the recipient benefit from the action. In hunter-gatherer societies, everyone had a way to contribute to the group; some people hunted, some sought out berries or edible plants others took care of children. This way, everyone benefited from the work of others.

Let's say you've arranged with your partner that they wash the dishes whenever you cook. If this is the preferred arrangement for both of you, you both can benefit from it.

On the other hand, altruistic behaviour benefits the recipient with no benefit to the actor.

This could involve anything from volunteering to help someone carry their shopping home, helping your siblings with homework, or donating a kidney to a stranger.

The common denominator in all these examples is that the act is selfless, with no expectations that the other person will return a favour.

The motivations behind prosocial behaviours can be diverse; they can be part of the social norms. When it's customary to offer help, we don't think twice about whether we should do it or not. We can also be motivated by reciprocity. We might want to help people that have helped us before. Other times, we might be motivated by empathy – we help them because we want others to help us in a similar situation. We'll break down the theories which highlight how all these motives can inform our actions.

Prosocial behaviour and altruism, volunteers distributing food donations, VaiaFig 1 - We've seen the power of prosocial behaviour in community responses to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Differences Between Prosocial Behaviour and Altruism

Altruism is a type of prosocial behaviour. Contrary to other prosocial behaviours, it involves a selfless concern for the well-being of others. Altruistic behaviour refers to acts that benefit others with no benefit to you or at a cost to yourself. It can be motivated by genetic survival, feelings of empathy, or social norms, but it's not motivated by reciprocity.

One evolutionary explanation points to increasing genetic survival as a reason behind altruism. When we direct altruism towards someone genetically related to us, like our child, helping them means improving the reproductive success of our genes. For example, mothers can stay awake all night taking care of a crying baby, even if it means going to work exhausted the next day.

Social learning theory: examples of prosocial behaviours in early childhood

Research has found that children spontaneously help others early, but why is it so? According to the social learning theory, children learn to be prosocial through reinforcement and exposure to social norms.

Growing up, we learn helping behaviour by being exposed to social norms like reciprocity (if you do good to others, they will repay with the same behaviour) or social responsibility (we are responsible for helping those who depend on us).

As children, we are also rewarded for helping others, and we are told off for behaviour that is harmful to others. This way, we learn to act prosocial in the future.

Gentile et al. (2009) demonstrated that exposure to prosocial video games encouraged more prosocial behaviour in children and young adults. He found that students who played prosocial games before an experimental task acted in a way that benefited others. In contrast, students who played aggressive video games acted in a way that hurt others. This study demonstrated that the behaviour we are exposed to could predict how we act toward other people.

However, other studies suggest that prosocial behaviour might be present in early childhood before we begin to learn about social norms (Warneken and Tomasello, 2006); this might suggest something intrinsic about helping behaviour.

Prosocial Behaviour and Altruism, a boy sitting on a bed with game console in his hands, VaiaFig 2 - Some studies suggest that we learn how to behave from the content we are exposed to.

Factors Affecting Helping Behaviour

The bystander effect is one phenomenon that gives us insight into what factors affect helping behaviour. The bystander effect refers to situations when people fail to act in an emergency because of the presence of other bystanders.

One factor contributing to helping behaviour is feeling responsible for acting. Let's consider one popular example illustrating the bystander effect – the case of Kitty Genovese, who was murdered outside of her New York flat in the 1960s. After her murder, it was reported that 38 people witnessed the murder but did not respond during the entire 35 minutes that the murder was occurring.

The presence of multiple other people that could act instead of us can reduce the feeling of personal responsibility to help the person in need.

Another explanation for the bystander effect is pluralistic ignorance. People base their judgements on the reactions of others. If we don’t see others around us reacting, we might conclude there is no emergency. It, therefore, takes effort to be the first person to react when surrounded by an ignorant crowd.

Piliavin et al. (1969) Subway Samaritan study

Pilavin and colleagues experimented on bystanders in an everyday environment. They watched the responses of people travelling on the New York subway to a person collapsing. They were specifically interested in whether the reaction of bystanders would be affected by the victim's personal characteristics.

  • They found that when the person, who collapsed was using a walking cane, people helped them 95% of the time, but when the person, who collapsed was acting like a drunk they were only helped 50% of the time.

  • When they manipulated the race of the victim, there was no difference in helping behaviour when the victim was using a mobility aid. However, in the drunk condition, the victim was less likely to be helped by a bystander of an opposite race.

  • Interestingly, the number of other bystanders did not influence the speed of helping, meaning that the diffusion of responsibility played little role in influencing helping behaviour.

According to the authors, when we are exposed to an emergency where someone might require help, we are motivated to act because of the physical arousal we experience. However, whether we act or not further depends on our cost-benefit analysis of the situation. We engage in helping behaviour when the benefits outweigh the costs.

If you were a participant in the Pilavin study, you might consider helping a person with a cane to be more rewarding and have fewer costs. Some benefits would include feeling better about helping someone in need, being seen as a good person by others, or receiving gratitude from the person. On the other hand, helping a drunk person might carry more perceived risks for you and potentially fewer rewards, so you're less likely to do it.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism, people sitting on a Subway, VaiaFig 2 - Pilavin et al. studied factors affecting helping behaviour on a Subway

Levine et al. (2001) Cross-cultural altruism

To investigate the potential cross-cultural factors that could influence helping behaviour, Levine and colleagues set up a series of repeated experiments in large cities across 23 countries. They measured helping in non-emergency situations (a person dropping a pen or a person in a leg brace dropping magazines) and emergencies (a blind person attempting to cross the street).

The researchers analysed the correlations between the population size, the economic situation, individualism-collectivism and walking speed in each country with the helping behaviour observed. It was found that the only variable that correlated with helping behaviour was the economy.

  • People in richer countries were less likely to help strangers than those in poorer countries.

  • Moreover, people engaged in helping behaviour more in Latin America, this was linked to simpatia, which is a cultural value of working towards harmony in society and cultivating warm interpersonal relationships.

In the study, Levine demonstrates how economic or cultural factors can affect people's likelihood to engage in prosocial behaviour.

Benefits of Prosocial Behaviour

When considering the benefits of prosocial behaviour, we must consider the benefits to society and the individual.

Prosocial behaviour can certainly benefit society as a whole. It encourages reciprocity and cooperation or even selfless support of others in need. If prosocial behaviour is the standard, we can feel safe that we won't be left alone when we are in need. Moreover, groups can often achieve more than a single person, which benefits the productivity of a society. For example, in hunter-gatherer societies, men hunted in groups rather than alone. By hunting in groups, they could hunt down bigger prey than alone.

From an individual perspective, the benefits of prosocial behaviour can contribute to the decision to act prosocially (cost-benefit analysis). These benefits can be direct or indirect. We directly benefit when we receive something in return from the person we helped or indirectly when the action makes us feel better about ourselves or improves our reputation in the community.

We can consider indirect benefits even when engaging in seemingly altruistic actions. For example, we might decide to donate blood because we know that other people admire blood donors.

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism - Key takeaways

  • Prosocial behaviour refers to actions performed with an intention to benefit others. Examples of prosocial behaviour include cooperation and altruism.
  • We see evidence of prosocial behaviour as soon as in early childhood. According to the social learning theory, children learn to be prosocial through reinforcement and exposure to social norms.
  • Research on the bystander effect suggests that factors influencing prosocial behaviour include perceived responsibility, pluralistic ignorance, the cost-benefit analysis, as well as, cultural and economic factors.
  • Piliavin et al. (1969) investigated the influence of the victim's characteristics on helping behaviour, while Levine et al. (2001) analysed cross-cultural variables that could influence prosocial behaviour.
  • Prosocial behaviour can involve benefits to the society as a whole as well as benefits to the individual.

References

  1. Levine, R. V, Norenzayan, A. & Philbrick, K. (2001) Cross-cultural differences in helping strangers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 32, (5), 543–560.
  2. Piliavin I. M., Rodin, J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1969). Good samaritanism: an underground phenomenon?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 13(4), 289.
  3. Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Yukawa, S., Ihori, N., Saleem, M., Ming, L. K., Shibuya, A., Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., Bushman, B. J., Rowell Huesmann, L., & Sakamoto, A. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 35(6), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045

Frequently Asked Questions about Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism

Altruism is a type of prosocial behaviour. Contrary to other prosocial behaviours, which can involve reciprocity or some benefits to the actor, altruistic behaviour comes with no benefit or at a cost to the actor.

Prosocial behaviour can result in benefits to society as a whole. It encourages reciprocity and cooperation or even selfless support of others in need. If prosocial behaviour is the standard, we can expect others to help us once we need it.

Prosocial behaviour can be driven by altruism but it's not always the case. In some cases, prosocial behaviour is driven by expectations of reciprocity or mutual benefit.

Examples of prosocial behaviour include volunteering, taking care of others, donating blood or protecting others from harm by taking action at the time of emergency.

Prosocial behaviour can be studied using surveys or experiments. Experiments can involve presenting participants with an opportunity to help a person in need and recording their behaviour.

Final Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism Quiz

Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism Quiz - Teste dein Wissen

Question

Why might the bystander effect occur?

Show answer

Answer

  • If no one else is helping, the individual believes the situation is not an emergency.
  • They fear others will unfavourably judge them.
  • Diffusion of responsibility.

Show question

Question

What is the diffusion of responsibility?

Show answer

Answer

If there are several bystanders, each bystander feels their responsibility decreases.

Show question

Question

What was the aim of Piliavin et al. (1969) study?

Show answer

Answer

The aim was to investigate whether subway passengers would be more likely to help someone drunk or ill and white or black. They also investigated whether the presence of a helper would influence others to help too.

Show question

Question

How many trials in total were conducted?

Show answer

Answer

103 trials.

Show question

Question

Around how many participants in total took part in the experiment?


Show answer

Answer

Around 4450 participants.

Show question

Question

What were the two conditions of the study?

Show answer

Answer

The ‘no help’ condition and the ‘help’ condition

Show question

Question

What were the study controls?


Show answer

Answer

  • The victims all dressed the same and behaved the same way, so all participants were exposed to the same standardised behaviour.
  • The scenario took place between the same two subway stations in New York City.
  • Victims were always male.

Show question

Question

Who did the study find is more likely to receive help, an ill or a drunk person?

Show answer

Answer

An ill person.

Show question

Question

In both conditions, who were more likely to help, men or women?

Show answer

Answer

Men.

Show question

Question

In how many trials did people come to an ill person’s assistance before the helper?

Show answer

Answer

In 62 out of 65 trials.

Show question

Question

In how many trials did people come to a drunk person’s assistance before the helper?

Show answer

Answer

In 19 out of 38 trials.

Show question

Question

In what percentage of trials did more than one person come to the victim’s assistance?

Show answer

Answer

In 60% of the trials.

Show question

Question

What did Piliavin et al. (1969) conclude from the study?

Show answer

Answer

They found that more help was given and more quickly than ‘the bystander effect’ and ‘diffusion of responsibility’ would have suggested. The results could be due to the location where the passengers were in a subway, and there was no way for them to ‘escape’ or run away from the emergency, resulting in a higher level of assistance.

Show question

Question

What was Piliavin et al. (1969) model of why someone helps another?

Show answer

Answer

When someone witnesses an emergency, it prompts an emotional response, and they decide whether they help by a cost-reward analysis. Their motivation to help is to get rid of the unpleasant emotions while witnessing the emergency.

Show question

Question

What were the ethical considerations of the study?

Show answer

Answer

As this was a field experiment, the participants could not consent before being in the study. Also, it was not possible to withdraw from the study. It may have been stressful for the participants to see someone collapse. If the participant did not help at the time, later they might have felt guilty for their inaction.

Show question

Question

What is altruism?

Show answer

Answer

The act of helping others because you are concerned about them and truly want to help them. This concern is unselfish and does not require reciprocation in any form.

Show question

Question

What did Levine et al. (2001) want to investigate?

Show answer

Answer

They wanted to cross-culturally investigate factors that may influence helping behaviour in a city. 

Show question

Question

What were the cultural values the study looked at?


Show answer

Answer

Individualism vs collectivism and ‘simpatia’.

Show question

Question

How many countries was the study conducted in?

Show answer

Answer

18.

Show question

Question

How did the study try to control for experimenter effects?

Show answer

Answer

All experimenters were male. They received a detailed information sheet and training in acting out the roles. They all practised their parts together. No verbal communication was required of the experimenters.

Show question

Question

What were the three helping measures used in the study?

Show answer

Answer

The three helping measures were: dropping the pen, hurting leg, helping a blind person cross the road.

Show question

Question

What city was ranked first in helping behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Show question

Question

What were the study results?

Show answer

Answer

The only variable associated with helping behaviour was economic productivity. People tended to help more in countries with poorer economies. Also, ‘simpatia’ countries were more helpful than ‘non-simpatia’ countries. 

Show question

Question

Why may countries with poorer economies be more helpful?

Show answer

Answer

Countries with poorer economies may also have a more traditional value system that includes guidelines for helping strangers.

Show question

Question

Did individualism vs collectivism make a difference to helping behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Yes.

Show question

Question

Are the results of this study generalisable?

Show answer

Answer

Yes, because the study tested a large number of countries and participants.

Show question

Question

DELETE

Show answer

Answer

They cannot establish cause and effect.

Show question

Question

What is prosocial behaviour? 

Show answer

Answer

Prosocial behaviour refers to actions that result in a benefit to other people.

Show question

Question

What factors motivate prosocial behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Social norms, reciprocity or empathy can motivate prosocial behaviours.

Show question

Question

How does social learning theory explain prosocial behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Social learning theory argues through reinforcement and exposure to social norms, children learn to be prosocial. 

Show question

Question

What evidence supports the social learning explanation of prosociality?

Show answer

Answer

Exposure to prosocial content for example in video games predicts prosocial behaviours in children and young adults (Gentile et al., 2009).

Show question

Question

You've arranged with your partner that whenever you cook, they wash the dishes. This is an example of ____

Show answer

Answer

Cooperation.

Show question

Question

Altruism is motivated by reciprocity.

Show answer

Answer

False.

Show question

Question

What statements about prosocial behaviour are true?

Show answer

Answer

Prosocial behaviour allows for effective cooperation in groups.

Show question

Question

What is the bystander effect?

Show answer

Answer

The bystander effect refers to situations when people fail to act in an emergency because of the presence of other bystanders.

Show question

Question

What is altruism?

Show answer

Answer

Altruism is a selfless concern for the well-being of others. Altruistic behaviour refers to acts that benefit others with no benefit to you or at a cost to yourself.

Show question

Question

What motivates altruistic behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Increasing genetic survival, feelings of empathy, or social norms can motivate altruism.  

Show question

Question

Outline an example of indirectly benefiting from prosocial behaviour.

Show answer

Answer

Donating blood because you want others to admire you for it.

Show question

Question

Why is cooperation beneficial?

Show answer

Answer

Groups can often achieve more than one single person can. For example, in hunter-gatherer societies, men hunted in groups rather than alone. By hunting in groups, they could hunt down bigger prey than they could alone. 

Show question

Question

What is the difference between altruism and prosocial behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Altruism is a type of prosocial behaviour. Contrary to other prosocial behaviours, which can involve reciprocity or some benefits to the actor, altruistic behaviour comes with no benefit or at a cost to the actor.

Show question

Question

Is prosocial behaviour driven by altruism? 

Show answer

Answer

Prosocial behaviour can be driven by altruism but it’s not always the case. In some cases, prosocial behaviour is driven by expectations of reciprocity or mutual benefit.

Show question

Question

What study investigated how personal characteristics of the victim influence helping behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Piliavin et al. (1969) Subway Samaritan study.

Show question

Question

Piliavin et al. (1969) Subway Samaritan study was a ____

Show answer

Answer

Field experiment.

Show question

Question

How did Pilavin et al. (1969) investigate helping behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

They watched the responses of people travelling on the New York subway to a person collapsing. 

Show question

Question

What are examples of prosocial behaviours? 

Show answer

Answer

E.g. volunteering, taking care of others, donating blood or protecting others from harm by taking action at the time of emergency. 

Show question

Question

What social norms encourage prosocial behaviour?

Show answer

Answer

Reciprocity and social responsibility.

Show question

Question

What is the difference between mutualism and altruism?

Show answer

Answer

Mutualism benefits both parties, while altruism only benefits the recipient (but not the actor).

Show question

Question

According to studies on prosocial behaviour, playing prosocial video games makes children more likely to engage in helping behaviour.

Show answer

Answer

True.

Show question

Question

Levine et al. (2001) found people in richer countries to be more likely to engage in helping behaviours.

Show answer

Answer

False.

Show question

Question

Why were the people in Latin American countries more likely to help strangers, according to Levine et al. (2001)?

Show answer

Answer

Because of simpatia, a cultural value of working towards harmony in society and cultivating warm interpersonal relationships.

Show question

60%

of the users don't pass the Prosocial Behaviour And Altruism quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

Start Quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

How would you like to learn this content?

Creating flashcards
Studying with content from your peer
Taking a short quiz

Free psychology cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Access cheat sheet

Discover the right content for your subjects

No need to cheat if you have everything you need to succeed! Packed into one app!

Study Plan

Be perfectly prepared on time with an individual plan.

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with gamified quizzes.

Flashcards

Create and find flashcards in record time.

Notes

Create beautiful notes faster than ever before.

Study Sets

Have all your study materials in one place.

Documents

Upload unlimited documents and save them online.

Study Analytics

Identify your study strength and weaknesses.

Weekly Goals

Set individual study goals and earn points reaching them.

Smart Reminders

Stop procrastinating with our study reminders.

Rewards

Earn points, unlock badges and level up while studying.

Magic Marker

Create flashcards in notes completely automatically.

Smart Formatting

Create the most beautiful study materials using our templates.

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

Start learning with StudySmarter, the only learning app you need.

Sign up now for free
Illustration